Publication: Una concepción pragmatista sobre las reglas
Authors
García Jorge, Pedro A.
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.402561
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La defensa de la normatividad del significado ha derivado en el debate sobre la prioridad metafísica de las reglas o del significado (cfr. Glüer and Wikforss, 2018). Sin embargo, la defensa de la prioridad de las reglas no es más que una variante de intelectualismo y, por ende, está sujeta a las mismas críticas que éste, mientras que la defensa de la prioridad del significado deja sin respuesta a la pregunta metasemántica ¿cómo
es qué el lenguaje es significativo? Una concepción pragmatista sobre las reglas permite superar el debate evitando el intelectualismo y proporcionando una respuesta a la pregunta metasemántica.
Defending the normativity of meaning has led to the debate about the metaphysical priority of either rules or meaning (cfr. Glüer & Wikforss, 2018). On the one hand, defending priority of rules is just a variant of intellectualism and, therefore, it is subject to the same criticisms. On the other hand, defending priority of meaning leaves the meta-semantic question: how is it that language is significant? unanswered. A pragmatist conception of rules makes it possible to overcome the debate by avoiding intellectualism and providing an answer to the meta-semantic question
Defending the normativity of meaning has led to the debate about the metaphysical priority of either rules or meaning (cfr. Glüer & Wikforss, 2018). On the one hand, defending priority of rules is just a variant of intellectualism and, therefore, it is subject to the same criticisms. On the other hand, defending priority of meaning leaves the meta-semantic question: how is it that language is significant? unanswered. A pragmatist conception of rules makes it possible to overcome the debate by avoiding intellectualism and providing an answer to the meta-semantic question
publication.page.subject
Reglas , Intelectualismo , Tesis de la Normalidad , Significado , Pragmatismo , Rules , Intellectualism , Normativity , Thesis , Meaning , Pragmatism
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº 84, 2021 pp. 147-162
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/