Publication: Guardias localizadas y STJUE 30 octubre 2025, c-373/24 continuidad de la doctrina.
Authors
Cuadros Garrido, María Elisa
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Colex
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69592/2952-1955-N7-DIC-2025-ART-1
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
Description
Abstract
La STJUE 30 octubre 2025 concluye que un fiscal adjunto municipal, está obligado durante todos sus periodos de guardia a permanecer en condiciones de realizar, en cualquier momento, las mismas tareas que desempeña durante su jornada ordinaria. En consecuencia, no puede alejarse del lugar de trabajo durante una guardia presencial ni de su domicilio durante una guardia no presencial, ni dedicarse libremente a sus intereses personales. Por lo que se declara en una línea continuista, que la guardia localizada es tiempo de trabajo.
Abstract: The CJEU, in its judgment of October 30, 2025, concluded that a municipal deputy prosecutor is obligated, during all on-call periods, to remain ready to perform, at any time, the same tasks they perform during their regular working hours. Consequently, they cannot leave their workplace during an on-call duty or their home during a remote on-call duty, nor can they freely pursue personal interests. Therefore, consistent with previous rulings, the court declared that on-call duty is considered working time.
Abstract: The CJEU, in its judgment of October 30, 2025, concluded that a municipal deputy prosecutor is obligated, during all on-call periods, to remain ready to perform, at any time, the same tasks they perform during their regular working hours. Consequently, they cannot leave their workplace during an on-call duty or their home during a remote on-call duty, nor can they freely pursue personal interests. Therefore, consistent with previous rulings, the court declared that on-call duty is considered working time.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Cuadros Garrido, M.E. (2025) “Guardias localizadas y STJUE 30 octubre 2025 (C373-2024): continuidad de la doctrina”, Revista Justicia & Trabajo, (7), p. 9. doi:10.69592/2952-1955-N7-DIC-2025-ART-1.
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/