Publication: The social construction of homoparentality: academia, media, and expert discourse
Authors
Dominguez de la Rosa, Laura ; Montalbán-Peregrín, Francisco Manuel
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La construcción social de la homoparentalidad: ámbito académico,
medios de comunicación y discurso experto.
Resumen: Este trabajo pretende conocer las estrategias discursivas desde
las que se está construyendo el fenómeno homoparental en diferentes es-
pacios públicos, como son: el ámbito académico, los medios de comunica-
ción y el ámbito experto profesional-legislativo. El método de investiga-
ción que se utiliza es cualitativo, concretamente, el Análisis del Discurso a
partir de la propuesta de Potter y Wetherell de los repertorios interpretati-
vos. Así comprobamos que se privilegia el uso de estrategias normalizado-
ras defensivas frente al riesgo de homofobia y ataque a la diversidad fami-
liar. Se corre el riesgo de difuminar recursos y experiencias que pudieran
contribuir a una construcción colectiva del fenómeno más rica, en su refle-
jo en avances sobre la acción legislativa, política y social
This study analysed the discursive strategies used to construct the phenomenon of gay and lesbian parenting in different public settings such as academia, the media, and the law. A qualitative research method was used: specifically, discourse analysis based on Potter and Wetherell’s proposals concerning interpretive repertoires. It was found that defensive normalisation strategies are favoured against the risk of homophobia and attacks on family diversity. There is a risk of overlooking resources and experiences that could con- tribute to a richer collective construction of the phenomenon, reflecting its progress in the legislative, social, and political fields.
This study analysed the discursive strategies used to construct the phenomenon of gay and lesbian parenting in different public settings such as academia, the media, and the law. A qualitative research method was used: specifically, discourse analysis based on Potter and Wetherell’s proposals concerning interpretive repertoires. It was found that defensive normalisation strategies are favoured against the risk of homophobia and attacks on family diversity. There is a risk of overlooking resources and experiences that could con- tribute to a richer collective construction of the phenomenon, reflecting its progress in the legislative, social, and political fields.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.