Publication: Últimas tendencias de un modelo de protección antidiscriminatoria en constante evolución: el caso J.D. y A. contra Reino Unido.
Authors
Hernández Llinás, Laura
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.452751
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El objeto central del presente trabajo es el comentario de un caso recientemente
resuelto por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, el asunto J.D. y A. contra Reino
Unido. Las particularidades de este caso nos permiten comprobar algunas debilidades y
fortalezas de la doctrina del Tribunal de Estrasburgo en materia de igualdad y no
discriminación, un ámbito de incuestionable valor en el espacio europeo de derechos, así como
destacar la emergencia de nuevos planteamientos tuitivos en relación con la siempre
controvertida figura de la discriminación por indiferenciación.
The main purpose of this essay is to analyse the judgement recently delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in J.D. and A. versus United Kingdom case. This case enables us to highlight some strengths and weaknesses of the Court’s non-discrimination case-law, as well as to draw attention to a new protective approach that the Court takes when it comes to remedy the effects of discrimination by undifferentiation, an always controversial issue. Given the arrival of an increasing number of cases related to article 14 CEDH and the Court’s broader interpretation of such article within the last decade, taking a closer look to its case-law on the matter seems to be of interest to study the development of common standards on the protection of human rights within the Council of Europe.
The main purpose of this essay is to analyse the judgement recently delivered by the European Court of Human Rights in J.D. and A. versus United Kingdom case. This case enables us to highlight some strengths and weaknesses of the Court’s non-discrimination case-law, as well as to draw attention to a new protective approach that the Court takes when it comes to remedy the effects of discrimination by undifferentiation, an always controversial issue. Given the arrival of an increasing number of cases related to article 14 CEDH and the Court’s broader interpretation of such article within the last decade, taking a closer look to its case-law on the matter seems to be of interest to study the development of common standards on the protection of human rights within the Council of Europe.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Anales de Derecho, Nº Especial, 2020
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/