Publication: La racionalidad tecnológica de Mario Bunge
como oposición al pensamiento crítico
de Stephen Kemmis
Loading...
Date
1999
Authors
Encabo Fernández, Eduardo
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El mejor modo de proceder a la hora de resolver problemas, de investigar o de
educar, siempre ha sido motivo de búsqueda por parte de muchos pensadores. Se expone en este
texto el posicionamiento de dos autores con pensamientos divergentes: por un lado Mario Bunge, teórico que opta por el modelo tecnocrático, por una visión positivista de la Investigación y de la Educación, y por el otro Stephen Kemmis, que aboga por una concepción crítica de ambas. La
comparación entre ambas teorías será el tema
central de este escrito.
Abstract: The best way to proceed when there are problems to solve, in Research, and in Education, always has been a reason of search from thinkers. Is exposed in this text the altitude of two thinkers whose thoughts are divergents. In one of the sides, Mario Bunge, theoretician that chooses the technocratic paradigm, a positivist vision of Research and Education, and in the other side, Stephen Kemmis, that pleads on a critical conception of both. The comparison of both theories be the central point of this written.
Abstract: The best way to proceed when there are problems to solve, in Research, and in Education, always has been a reason of search from thinkers. Is exposed in this text the altitude of two thinkers whose thoughts are divergents. In one of the sides, Mario Bunge, theoretician that chooses the technocratic paradigm, a positivist vision of Research and Education, and in the other side, Stephen Kemmis, that pleads on a critical conception of both. The comparison of both theories be the central point of this written.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.