Publication: Importancia de los indicadores metodológicos-analíticos en el nivel de concreción de los diseños de investigación
de los artículos científicos en educación
Loading...
Date
2022
Authors
Rodríguez-Sabiote, Clemente ; Úbeda-Sánchez, Álvaro Manuel ; Olmedo-Moreno, Eva María ; Álvarez-Rodríguez, José
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.441741
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La presente investigación pretende establecer la importancia que juegan los diferentes
indicadores de naturaleza metodológico-analítica incluidos en los informes de investigación
presentados en los artículos científicos. Así pues, nuestro interés se centra en determinar cuáles
de dichos indicadores son los mejores predictores para establecer un perfil de artículo científico
con un mayor o menor grado de concreción. Para este fin, seleccionamos todos los artículos
científicos publicados en las siete revistas españolas del ámbito de la investigación educativa
indexadas en la base de datos Journal Citation Report (JCR) durante el año 2016. Exactamente
seleccionamos un total de 479 trabajos publicados durante el trienio 2014-2016. Cada una de
las revistas obtuvo una puntuación general dependiendo de la presencia vs ausencia de dichos
indicadores metodológicos. Tras la implementación de la técnica de Árboles de Decisión, donde se ha tomado como variable criterio dicha variable transformada en una nueva variable ficticia
agrupada en tres niveles y como predictores los diez indicadores metodológico-analíticos hemos
comprobado que, efectivamente, algunos de estos indicadores juegan un papel más importante
que otros en la concreción de los diseños de investigación planteados en los trabajos objeto de
investigación. De esta forma, apreciamos como son los indicadores relativos a los criterios de
rigor metodológico (CA1); tipo de muestreo-s considerado-s (MU3); y la metodología de abordaje
del estudio (ME) los que han resultado determinantes para el establecimiento de diseños
metodológico-analítico más completos.
This research aims to establish the importance of the different indicators of a methodologicalanalytical nature included in the research reports presented in scientific articles. Thus, our interest is focused on determining which of these indicators are the best predictors for establishing a scientific article profile with a higher or lower degree of concreteness. For this purpose, we selected all the scientific articles published in the seven Spanish journals within the field of educational research indexed in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) database during 2016. More precisely, we selected a total of 479 papers published during the three-year period 2014-2016. Each journal obtained an overall score depending on the presence vs absence of such methodological indicators. Following the implementation of the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection technique, where this variable, transformed into a new fictitious variable grouped into three levels, has been taken as a variable criterion, and, as predictors, the ten methodological-analytical indicators, it has been found that, in fact, some methodological-analytical indicators play a more important role than others in the concreteness of the research designs raised in the research work. In this way, we are able to determine how these indicators related to the quality criteria are (QUC); the type of sampling-s considered (ST3); and the study methodology (ME), which have been decisive for the establishment of more complete methodological-analytical designs.
This research aims to establish the importance of the different indicators of a methodologicalanalytical nature included in the research reports presented in scientific articles. Thus, our interest is focused on determining which of these indicators are the best predictors for establishing a scientific article profile with a higher or lower degree of concreteness. For this purpose, we selected all the scientific articles published in the seven Spanish journals within the field of educational research indexed in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) database during 2016. More precisely, we selected a total of 479 papers published during the three-year period 2014-2016. Each journal obtained an overall score depending on the presence vs absence of such methodological indicators. Following the implementation of the Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection technique, where this variable, transformed into a new fictitious variable grouped into three levels, has been taken as a variable criterion, and, as predictors, the ten methodological-analytical indicators, it has been found that, in fact, some methodological-analytical indicators play a more important role than others in the concreteness of the research designs raised in the research work. In this way, we are able to determine how these indicators related to the quality criteria are (QUC); the type of sampling-s considered (ST3); and the study methodology (ME), which have been decisive for the establishment of more complete methodological-analytical designs.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Revista de Investigación Educativa, RIE, V. 40, N. 2, 2022, pp. 365-383
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/