Publication: Pierre Bayle y la imposibilidad del debate racional
sobre el mal
Authors
García Alonso, Marta
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.425171
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
En ese artículo, sugerimos que el
debate sobre la teodicea bayleana tiene por finalidad
evidenciar el uso ilegítimo que se hace de la
filosofía al aplicarla a la controversia religiosa. La
polémica sobre el mal no supone una disputa entre
la razón en sentido absoluto y la religión, sino que
compromete el uso de la razón en la revelación,
de modo exclusivo Por esa razón, como veremos,
el filósofo de Rotterdam no limita su crítica a la
teología calvinista de su tiempo, sino que la dirige
al mismo corazón de la teología cristiana: la obra
de Agustin de Hipona.
I claim that Bayle engaged with theodicy in order to show how philosophy was misused in religious matters. For Bayle, the debate on evil does not oppose dichotomically reason and religion, it just requires that the participants deal with revealed truths using reason alone. In this regard, Bayle does not only criticize the Calvinist theologians of his time, but also the very source of Christian theology, Augustine of Hippo.
I claim that Bayle engaged with theodicy in order to show how philosophy was misused in religious matters. For Bayle, the debate on evil does not oppose dichotomically reason and religion, it just requires that the participants deal with revealed truths using reason alone. In this regard, Bayle does not only criticize the Calvinist theologians of his time, but also the very source of Christian theology, Augustine of Hippo.
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº 86 (2022), pp. 149-162
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/