Publication: La Ética de Spinoza como proyecto onto-gnoseológico
Authors
García Ruzo, Antonieta
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.423251
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El presente trabajo es un intento por
repensar el modo en que ha sido interpretada la
primera parte de la Ética de Baruch Spinoza por
la tradición. Fundamentalmente, busca alejarse de
las interpretaciones que llamamos “ontológicas”
—que sostienen que las distinciones conceptuales
allí postuladas refieren a diferentes ámbitos
de lo real—, para defender una lectura que tenga
al factor gnoseológico como principio explicativo
de tales distinciones. Se intentará mostrar
que mediante esta hipótesis de lectura se accede
a aquello que nos parece ser el más auténtico
espíritu spinozista: aquel donde la multiplicidad
de las perspectivas del conocimiento humano se
vuelve coherente con la más absoluta univocidad
de lo real.
The following paper is an attempt to rethink the way in which the first part of Baruch Spinoza’s Ethics has been interpreted by tradition. Fundamentally, it seeks to move away from what we call “ontological” interpretations —which maintain that the conceptual distinctions postulated refer to different areas of the real— and posits a reading utilizing the gnoseological factor to explain the principle of such distinctions. An attempt will be made to show that through this interpretation one gains access to what seems to be the most authentic Spinozist spirit: one where the multiplicity of the perspectives of human knowledge becomes coherent with the most absolute univocity of the real.
The following paper is an attempt to rethink the way in which the first part of Baruch Spinoza’s Ethics has been interpreted by tradition. Fundamentally, it seeks to move away from what we call “ontological” interpretations —which maintain that the conceptual distinctions postulated refer to different areas of the real— and posits a reading utilizing the gnoseological factor to explain the principle of such distinctions. An attempt will be made to show that through this interpretation one gains access to what seems to be the most authentic Spinozist spirit: one where the multiplicity of the perspectives of human knowledge becomes coherent with the most absolute univocity of the real.
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº 86 (2022), pp. 101-116
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/