Publication: Libertad y Naturaleza en la Filosofía kantiana de la Historia
Loading...
Date
2011
Authors
Beade, Ileana P.
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
En este trabajo proponemos examinar
hasta qué punto la concepción teleológica de la
Historia desarrollada en los escritos jurídico-polí-
ticos kantianos (concepción fundada en la idea de
una Naturaleza providencial, garante del progreso
del género humano) se halla en conflicto con la
concepción del hombre como ser esencialmente
libre. Atendiendo a este objetivo, consideraremos,
en primer lugar, de qué modo ha de ser interpretada
la idea de Naturaleza invocada en dichos
escritos, explicitando los argumentos que permiten
establecer que esta idea no implica limitación
alguna de la libertad humana, siendo así la realización
del progreso histórico un desafío propio
e ineludible del hombre, responsable único del
desarrollo moral, político y jurídico de su especie.
Abstract: In this paper we shall analyze to what limit the teleological conception of History outlined in Kant’s legal and political writings (a conception which is based on the idea of a providential nature that guarantees the progress of the human genre) is in conflict with the conception of man as esentially free. With this goal in mind, we shall consider, in the first place, how the idea of Nature invoked in those works must be interpreted, by making explicit the arguments on which the claim that that idea does not imply any limitation whatsoever to human freedom is based. The realization of historical progress becomes an unavoidable challenge to each single man, who must be therefore considered responsible for the moral, political and legal development of his species.
Abstract: In this paper we shall analyze to what limit the teleological conception of History outlined in Kant’s legal and political writings (a conception which is based on the idea of a providential nature that guarantees the progress of the human genre) is in conflict with the conception of man as esentially free. With this goal in mind, we shall consider, in the first place, how the idea of Nature invoked in those works must be interpreted, by making explicit the arguments on which the claim that that idea does not imply any limitation whatsoever to human freedom is based. The realization of historical progress becomes an unavoidable challenge to each single man, who must be therefore considered responsible for the moral, political and legal development of his species.
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.