Browsing by Subject "Chromosomal abnormalities"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Review of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects
    (Murcia : F. Hernández, 2003) Kuroda, Naoto; Toi, M.; Hiroi, Makoto; Enzan, H.
    In recent years, the concept of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been established. Chromophobe RCCs account for about 4-6% of all renal tumors. Macroscopically, the cut surface of the tumor is generally grey-beige in color. Histologically, there are two variants (typical and eosinophilic). In the typical variant, large tumor cells with architecture of a compact tubulo-cystic pattern proliferate. The cytoplasm is abundant and shows a fine reticular translucent pattern. The cell border is thick, prominent and eosinophilic. In the eosinophilic variant, tumor cells are smaller and markedly eosinophilic, and a perinuclear halo is often seen. Histochemically, the tumor cells generally show a diffuse and strong reaction for Hale's colloidal iron staining. Ultrastructurally, tumor cells contain many cytoplasmic microvesicles (150-300 nm). In chromosomal analysis, a low chromosome number is characteristic of chromophobe RCCs, due to the frequent occurrence of a combined loss of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21. In differential diagnosis, histological distinction from oncocytomas, which share a common phenotype (intercalated cells of the collecting duct system), is most important. In this diagnostic setting, recent studies have given rise to several problems. Firstly, some cases of coexistent chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma (so-called renal oncocytosis) or cases of oncocytoma with metastasis have recently been reported. Secondly, the existence of chromophobe adenoma, which is the benign counterpart of chromophobe RCC, and an oncocytic variant of chromophobe RCC has recently been suggested. Therefore, further studies are needed to elucidate the relationship between chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas, to confirm whether chromophobe adenoma actually exists or not, and to identify the key gene that causes chromophobe RCCs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Review of collecting duct carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects
    (Murcia : F. Hernández, 2002) Kuroda, Naoto; Toi, M.; Hiroi, Makoto; Enzan, H.
    In recent years, the concept of collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) has been established. CDCs constitute about 0.4 to 2% of RCCs. Macroscopically, CDCs occur in the renal medulla. On the cut surface, they are generally firm, white or grey and poorly circumscribed. Histologically, CDCs are characterized by various cytological and histological appearances. Furthermore, desmoplastic stromal reaction around the tumor and atypical hyperplastic changes or carcinoma in situ in the adjacent medullary collecting duct are freqently observed. Histological distinction from papillary RCCs is most important, because both tumors share some structural and histochemical features, and it seems that some investigators have confused diagnostic criteria for CDCs. On the other hand, the concept of medullary carcinoma, which preferentially occurs in a black race and shows histological features similar to those of CDC, has also recently been established. Although there have been few studies on chromosomal abnormalities of CDCs and consistent abnormalities have not been identified, a recent study using microsatellite analysis has shown a high frequency (60%) of LOH in 1q32.1- 32.2. Further studies are needed to elucidate the genetic characteristics of CDCs and to determine the relationship or difference between CDCs and medullary carcinomas.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Review of papillary renal cell carcinoma with focus on clinical and pathobiological aspects
    (Murcia : F. Hernández, 2003) Kuroda, Naoto; Toi, M.; Hiroi, Makoto; Enzan, H.
    Recent studies have shown that papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is clinically and genotypically a distinct entity. Papillary RCCs account for about 10-15% of renal parenchymal neoplasms. Macroscopically, the cut surface is yellow or brown in color and large tumors frequently show cystic change. Hemorrhage and necrosis are common. Histologically, Delahunt and Eble have classified papillary RCCs into type 1 (small cells, single layer) and type 2 (large cells, pseudostratification) according to the cytoplasmic volume and thickness of the lining cells. In chromosomal analysis, gain of chromosomes 7 and 17, loss of Y chromosome and additional gains (chromosome 3q, 8p, 12q, 16q and 20q) are frequently found in type 1 papillary RCCs, but the chromosomal aberration of type 2 papillary RCCs seems to be more heterogenous than that of type 1 papillary RCCs. Mutations of MET proto-oncogenes in some cases of both hereditary and sporadic papillary RCCs have recently been detected. Furthermore, all hereditary and sporadic papillary RCCs with MET proto-oncogene show type 1 histological features. Type 1 papillary RCCs generally seem to have a favorable prognosis, but type 2 tumors have a worse prognosis than do type 1 tumors. Papillary RCCs with involvement of the X chromosome and cancer syndrome with predisposition to cutaneous/uterine leiomyomas and papillary RCCs, the histological features of which are basically different from those of usual papillary RCCs, have also been recently reported. Since papillary RCCs seem to constitute clinically, histologically, and even genetically more heterogenous groups than previously thought, further investigations are needed to characterize the subtype of papillary RCC.