Publication: Ponencias.-Política y moralidad en el diálogo de ÁgnesHeller con Hannah Arendt
Loading...
Date
2020-07-27
Authors
Prior Olmos, Ángel
item.page.secondaryauthor
Universidad de Murcia
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
Description
Abstract
RESUMEN
Heller coincide con Arendt en defender un sentido político de la libertad, mientras que discrepa en la
separación radical de lo político y lo social. Arendt, protagonista de la moderna filosofía política radical y
expuesta a la “furia de la exclusión”, no logra superar su identificación entre voluntad, soberanía y decisión.
Referente a moralidad, ambas coinciden en postular un concepto de personalidad moral en base a la elección
existencial o a la dimensión moral del pensamiento. El concepto de la voluntad es para Heller imposible de
separar del relato en que se inserta y propone su abandono. Para Arendt cabe una lectura diferente desde la
perspectiva del “fin de la metafísica”. Las dos autoras por último muestran clara afinidad en la defensa de una
noción de responsabilidad, considerada por Heller como la categoría central de la ética.
ABSTRACT Heller agrees with Arendt upholding a politic sense of Freedom, but shows a different point of view when it comes to the radical gap between the political and social matter. Arendt, being protagonist of the political modern philosophy and exposed to the “fury of the exclusion”, is unable to overcome her identification between will, sovereignty and decision. With regards to morality, both agree to point out a concept of moral personality by means of the existential election or the moral dimension of thought. The concept of Will is, according to Heller, impossible to separate from the story in which it is inserted and proposes its withdrawal. For Arendt there is another possible reading from the perspective of the “end of the metaphysic”. Both authors show in the end an evident affinity in the defence of a notion of responsibility considered by Heller the central category of ethics.
ABSTRACT Heller agrees with Arendt upholding a politic sense of Freedom, but shows a different point of view when it comes to the radical gap between the political and social matter. Arendt, being protagonist of the political modern philosophy and exposed to the “fury of the exclusion”, is unable to overcome her identification between will, sovereignty and decision. With regards to morality, both agree to point out a concept of moral personality by means of the existential election or the moral dimension of thought. The concept of Will is, according to Heller, impossible to separate from the story in which it is inserted and proposes its withdrawal. For Arendt there is another possible reading from the perspective of the “end of the metaphysic”. Both authors show in the end an evident affinity in the defence of a notion of responsibility considered by Heller the central category of ethics.
publication.page.subject
Política , libertad , decisión , vita contemplativa , moralidad , responsabilidad , Politics , freedom , decision , vita contemplativa , morality , responsibility
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/