Publication:
Topical fluoride varnishes promote several biological responses on human gingival cells

dc.contributor.authorLópez García, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorPecci Lloret, María Pilar
dc.contributor.authorPecci Lloret, Miguel Ramón
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Gironés, Julia
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez Lozano, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Bernal, David
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-28T17:12:08Z
dc.date.available2025-01-28T17:12:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-18
dc.description© 2021, Elsevier. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Annals of Anatomy. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151829
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the in vitro cytotoxicity of four commercial topical fluoride varnishes widely used in daily dental practice for the prevention of caries on human fibroblasts: Cervitec F, Fixofluor, Fluor Protector S and Duraphat. Material and methods: Human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) were exposed to different concentrations of fluoride varnishes extracts. Biological assays, including MTT and IC50 value determination, annexin-V/7- AAD staining, cell migration and F-actin staining with phalloidin were carried out. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: At 4% concentration, all of the fluoride varnishes extracts affected fibroblasts metabolic activity, exhibiting ahighdegree of cytotoxicity at allmeasured time points.At 0.1%and 1%, Duraphat and Fixofluor or Fluor Protector S and Cervitec F exerted the lowest or highest cytotoxic effects, respectively. Similar effects were evidenced when induction of apoptosis/necrosis and cell migration assays were analyzed. Immunocytochemical assays revealed a similarnumber offibroblasts, without changes inthemorphology and F-actin content at 0.1% concentration of alltested materials, while at 1% concentration, Fluor Protector S and Cervitec F showed few cells with aberrant morphology or non-adhered cells, respectively. Conclusions: Different commercial topical fluoride varnishes with the same therapeutic indication may exhibit different biological effects and cytotoxicity on fibroblasts.
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Anatomy, 2021, Vol. 237 151723
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151829
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0940-9602
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1618-0402
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/149492
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relationLa financiación para el estudio procedía del proyecto de la Red TerCel financiado por el Instituto Carlos III, siendo un proyecto competitivo nacional denominado RD16/0011/001 RED DE TERAPIA CELULAR.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0940960221000492?via%3Dihub
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.subjectFluoride varnisheses
dc.subjectCytotoxicity
dc.subjectGingival cells
dc.subjectBiological effects
dc.titleTopical fluoride varnishes promote several biological responses on human gingival cellses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication2372b160-a380-45dd-835a-6f377fbeaf97
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery2372b160-a380-45dd-835a-6f377fbeaf97
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Aportación 5.pdf
Size:
740.26 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Artículo científico
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections