Publication: Inclusión, diversidad y equidad: diseño y validación de
un cuestionario de opinión dirigido al profesorado de
orientación educativa (IDEC-O)
Authors
Miranda Morais, Mirian ; Burguera Condon, Joaquín Lorenzo ; Arias Blanco, José Miguel ; Peña Suárez, Elsa
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.37.2.333891
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El propósito de este trabajo es presentar el estudio Delphi realizado para diseñar y validar
el contenido de un cuestionario de opinión elaborado ad hoc para recoger la opinión de orienta-
dores y orientadoras sobre cómo los centros asturianos responden a la diversidad en educación
primaria y secundaria. Se partió de un instrumento elaborado ad hoc del que se realizó una
aplicación piloto en la que participaron 51 orientadores y orientadoras de secundaria (N=51).
Con objeto de adecuar la validez de contenido a ambas etapas se realizó un estudio Delphi de
carácter cuantitativo y cualitativo en la que participaron 9 expertos. El estudio constó de dos
rondas y distintas tareas con objeto de someter al criterio de expertos los bloques que componen
el cuestionario y que recogen información sobre variables personales, profesionales, datos del
centro, en una escala Likert de 48 ítems y preguntas abiertas. Se realizó un análisis de contenido
de la información cualitativa y un análisis descriptivo, cálculo de la media, desviación típica y
el porcentaje de acuerdo respecto a los criterios adoptados para considerar un ítem como válido.
El resultado es un cuestionario de cinco bloques: tres recogen información sobre variables de
identificación y clasificación (datos sociodemográficos; datos profesionales; datos referidos al centro). El cuarto es una escala Likert de 45 ítems y cinco alternativas de respuesta (1= muy
en desacuerdo hasta 5= muy de acuerdo). El último consta de tres preguntas abiertas sobre
barreras, facilitadores y propuestas de mejora.
The aim of this paper focuses on the results of a Delphi study carried out to design and to validate the content of an “ad hoc” opinion questionnaire. The questionnaire has been developed to know the counselors’ opinion on how the Asturian centers attend to diversity in primary and secondary stages. It was based on an instrument previously carried out, which was sub- mitted to a pilot test in which 51 secondary school counselors participated (N = 51). In order to adapt the validity of the content to the two stages (primary and secondary), a quantitative and qualitative Delphi study was carried out in which 9 experts participated. The study was developed in two rounds and through different tasks in order to submit the blocks in which the questionnaire is structured to expert judgment. These blocks collect information on personal and professional variables and center data, on a Likert scale of 48 items and open questions. A content analysis of the qualitative information was carried out and a descriptive analysis of the mean, standard deviation and percentage of agreement in relation to the criteria adopted to consider an item as valid. The result is a questionnaire composed of five blocks: three of them collect information on identification and classification variables (sociodemographic, professional and center data). The fourth block is a Likert scale of 45 items and five response alternatives (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The last one is formed by three open questions about barriers, facilitators and improvement proposals.
The aim of this paper focuses on the results of a Delphi study carried out to design and to validate the content of an “ad hoc” opinion questionnaire. The questionnaire has been developed to know the counselors’ opinion on how the Asturian centers attend to diversity in primary and secondary stages. It was based on an instrument previously carried out, which was sub- mitted to a pilot test in which 51 secondary school counselors participated (N = 51). In order to adapt the validity of the content to the two stages (primary and secondary), a quantitative and qualitative Delphi study was carried out in which 9 experts participated. The study was developed in two rounds and through different tasks in order to submit the blocks in which the questionnaire is structured to expert judgment. These blocks collect information on personal and professional variables and center data, on a Likert scale of 48 items and open questions. A content analysis of the qualitative information was carried out and a descriptive analysis of the mean, standard deviation and percentage of agreement in relation to the criteria adopted to consider an item as valid. The result is a questionnaire composed of five blocks: three of them collect information on identification and classification variables (sociodemographic, professional and center data). The fourth block is a Likert scale of 45 items and five response alternatives (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The last one is formed by three open questions about barriers, facilitators and improvement proposals.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/