Publication: Fernando de Rojas y el primer acto de la Celestina. Algunas preguntas que esperan respuesta
Authors
Bernaldo de Quirós Mateo, José Antonio
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia: Universidad de Murcia, Editum
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Se
ha generalizado bastante la idea de que Fernando de Rojas es el autor
de
La Celestina
a partir del segundo acto. Sin embargo, esta visión de la
autoría se enfrenta a una serie de graves problemas a los que hasta ahora
no se ha dado solución, por lo que en
este trabajo se afirma que debe ser
considerada in
adecuada
. Además,
se intenta mostrar que
los argumentos
en que se basa son
frágiles y hasta contradictorios entre sí
It has been spread the idea that Fernando de Rojas is the author of La Celestina from the second act. However, this v iew of the authorship faces some serious problems that have not been solved so far; therefore, in this work that wiew is consider ed to be inadecuate. Furthermore, it tries to show that the arguments on which it is based are fragile and even contradictory in themselves
It has been spread the idea that Fernando de Rojas is the author of La Celestina from the second act. However, this v iew of the authorship faces some serious problems that have not been solved so far; therefore, in this work that wiew is consider ed to be inadecuate. Furthermore, it tries to show that the arguments on which it is based are fragile and even contradictory in themselves
publication.page.subject
Citation
Tonos digital, nº 32, 2017
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.