Publication: ¿Mundo fenoménico de la Sorge o mundo de la praxis humana? La crítica de Karel Kosík a la analítica existencial
de Martin Heidegger
Authors
Magnet Colomer, Jordi
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El filósofo checo Karel Kosík (1926-2003) llevó a cabo en su obra una recepción crítica del pensamiento de Martin Heidegger. En determinados capítulos de Dialéctica de lo concreto (1963), así como en otros ensayos tardíos, elaboró una crítica de la analítica existencial heideggeriana, principalmente a la concepción de la estructura del ser del Dasein como “preocupación” o “cuidado” (Sorge). Nos ocupamos aquí de dilucidar el sentido y el alcance de esta crítica a Ser y tiempo (1927).
Czech philosopher Karel Kosík (1926-2003) carried out in his work a critical reception of Martin Heidegger’s thought. In some chapters of Dialectics of the Concrete (1963), as well as in other late essays, he elaborated a critique of Heidegger’s existential analytic, particulary to the conception of the structure of Dasein’s being as “concern” or “care” (Sorge). We deal here to elucidate the meaning and scope of this critique of Being and Time (1927).
Czech philosopher Karel Kosík (1926-2003) carried out in his work a critical reception of Martin Heidegger’s thought. In some chapters of Dialectics of the Concrete (1963), as well as in other late essays, he elaborated a critique of Heidegger’s existential analytic, particulary to the conception of the structure of Dasein’s being as “concern” or “care” (Sorge). We deal here to elucidate the meaning and scope of this critique of Being and Time (1927).
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº 76, 2019, pp. 111-123
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.