Publication: El último episodio en materia de recorte de pensiones en el sur de Europa: Las distintas interpelaciones constitucionales
Authors
Ortiz González Conde, Francisco Miguel
item.page.secondaryauthor
Facultad de Ciencias del Trabajo
item.page.director
Publisher
Centro de Estudios Financieros
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2016.2152
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La relación entre las medidas adoptadas por los gobiernos del sur de Europa y sus exámenes de constitucionalidad no ha sido fácil, como atestigua el paradigmático caso portugués. Entre las medidas recientes adoptadas para contener el gasto público, España e Italia incluyeron la suspensión de la revalorización de pensiones en 2012 (y 2013). Sin embargo, ha pasado inadvertido que la coincidencia cronológica de estas medidas ha obligado a sus respectivos Tribunales Constitucionales a pronunciarse al respecto, con distinto desenlace. Este artículo nace con el objetivo de poner en contacto ambas situaciones, analizándolas desde un punto de vista comparado, en primer lugar, introduciendo la materia a través de los fundamentos de los mecanismos de revalorización de pensiones, las dinámicas de funcionamiento de ambas figuras jurídicas y las experiencias previas en suspensión de la revalorización, y, en segundo lugar, con los planteamientos jurídicos de ambos recursos de inconstitucionalidad, las ratio decidendi de ambas sentencias, y finalmente las críticas doctrinales suscitadas.
The relationship between the measures taken by the governments of southern Europe and its constitutionality exams has not been easy, as evidenced by the Portuguese paradigmatic case. Among recent measures to contain public spending, Spain and Italy included the suspension of pension revaluation in 2012 (and 2013). However, it has gone unnoticed that the chronological coincidence of these measures has forced their respective Constitutional Courts to rule on the matter, with different outcome. The aim of this paper is to connect both situations from a comparative point of view, firstly introducing the matter through the principles of the revaluation mechanisms, the dynamics of both legal figures, and the previous experiences in suspension of the revaluation; secondly, the legal approaches of both Courts, the ratio decidendi of both judgments and finally the doctrinal reviews.
The relationship between the measures taken by the governments of southern Europe and its constitutionality exams has not been easy, as evidenced by the Portuguese paradigmatic case. Among recent measures to contain public spending, Spain and Italy included the suspension of pension revaluation in 2012 (and 2013). However, it has gone unnoticed that the chronological coincidence of these measures has forced their respective Constitutional Courts to rule on the matter, with different outcome. The aim of this paper is to connect both situations from a comparative point of view, firstly introducing the matter through the principles of the revaluation mechanisms, the dynamics of both legal figures, and the previous experiences in suspension of the revaluation; secondly, the legal approaches of both Courts, the ratio decidendi of both judgments and finally the doctrinal reviews.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Revista De Trabajo Y Seguridad Social. CEF, (400), 107–134
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/