Publication: Herbert Marcuse: “El final de la utopía” en el siglo XXI
Authors
LÓPEZ SÁENZ, Ma CARMEN
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Este trabajo estudia el concepto de
“utopía” en la obra de Herbert Marcuse con objeto
de comprender su malinterpretada y descontex-
tualizada proclamación del final de la utopía en
1967. Comenzamos, para ello, diferenciando la
utopía de la ideología con la ayuda de Mannheim
y Ricoeur y situando la utopía marcusiana en el
contexto de la Escuela de Frankfurt y de la uto-
pía concreta (Bloch). Desde su temprana crítica
a Mannheim, Marcuse se mostrará como filó-
sofo dispuesto a restaurar las dimensiones repri-
midas de la racionalidad y el libre juego de las
facultades conducente a una nueva antropología.
Valoraremos la crítica habermasiana a la utopía y
concluiremos presentando algunas cristalizacio-
nes de la utopía marcusiana en el siglo XXI
This paper studies the concept of “utopia” in the work of Herbert Marcuse in order to understand his misconstrued and decontextualized proclamation of the end of the utopia in 1967. I will start with the distinction between utopia and ideology with the help of Mannheim and Ricoeur, and with the contextualization of Marcusian utopia in the Frankfurt School as well as in the concrete utopia (Bloch). From his early criticism of Mannheim, Marcuse is shown as a philosopher willing to restore the repressed dimensions of rationality as well as the free play of the faculties leading to a new anthropology. I value the Habermasian critique of utopia and I conclude presenting some crystallizations of the Marcusian utopia in the XXI century.
This paper studies the concept of “utopia” in the work of Herbert Marcuse in order to understand his misconstrued and decontextualized proclamation of the end of the utopia in 1967. I will start with the distinction between utopia and ideology with the help of Mannheim and Ricoeur, and with the contextualization of Marcusian utopia in the Frankfurt School as well as in the concrete utopia (Bloch). From his early criticism of Mannheim, Marcuse is shown as a philosopher willing to restore the repressed dimensions of rationality as well as the free play of the faculties leading to a new anthropology. I value the Habermasian critique of utopia and I conclude presenting some crystallizations of the Marcusian utopia in the XXI century.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.