Publication: ¿Quién dijo "aceleración"? Análisis de tres teorías y tres propuestas sobre la aceleración social
Authors
Galindo Hervás, Alfonso
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universitat Jaume I
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/recerca.9201
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Se reconstruyen y analizan tres teorías sobre el fenómeno de la aceleración social y tres propuestas sobre cómo enfrentarse a sus efectos patológicos. En concreto, se pre-senta la teoría de Kojève, subrayando su tesis de que la aceleración es un factor de des-humanización; la de Koselleck, que argumenta que es causa de desarraigo; y la de Rosa, que lo es de alienación. Tras ello, se examinan tres propuestas, interpretándolas como respuestas a cada uno de esos diagnósticos: la del propio Rosa, que recurre al concepto de resonancia como remedio a la alienación; la de Agamben, que propone lo que deno-mina una vida de «uso»frente a la lógica deshumanizadora del capitalismo subrayada por Kojève; y las propuestas aceleracionistas, que defienden superar el desarraigo diag-nosticado por Koselleck radicalizándolo. Se concluye sosteniendo la conveniencia de no demonizar indiferenciadamente la aceleración social, pues ello dificulta imaginar estra-tegias normativamente persuasivas para hacerle frente.
This article reconstructsand analyses three theories of social acceleration, together with three proposals on how to address its pathological effects. Specifically, it presents Kojève’s theory, highlighting his claim that acceleration is a factor of dehumanisation; Koselleck’s, which argues that it is a cause of uprooting; and Rosa’s, which conceives it as a source of alienation. It then examines three proposals, interpreting them as re-sponses to each of these diagnoses: Rosa’s own proposal, which draws on the concept of resonanceas a remedy for alienation; Agamben’s, which advances what he calls a life of “use” in response to the dehumanising logic of capitalism emphasised by Kojève; and accelerationist proposals, which advocate overcoming the uprooting diagnosed by Koselleck by radicalising it. The article concludes by arguing for the need to avoid indis-criminately demonising social acceleration, since doing so hinders imagining normatively persuasive strategies to confront it
This article reconstructsand analyses three theories of social acceleration, together with three proposals on how to address its pathological effects. Specifically, it presents Kojève’s theory, highlighting his claim that acceleration is a factor of dehumanisation; Koselleck’s, which argues that it is a cause of uprooting; and Rosa’s, which conceives it as a source of alienation. It then examines three proposals, interpreting them as re-sponses to each of these diagnoses: Rosa’s own proposal, which draws on the concept of resonanceas a remedy for alienation; Agamben’s, which advances what he calls a life of “use” in response to the dehumanising logic of capitalism emphasised by Kojève; and accelerationist proposals, which advocate overcoming the uprooting diagnosed by Koselleck by radicalising it. The article concludes by arguing for the need to avoid indis-criminately demonising social acceleration, since doing so hinders imagining normatively persuasive strategies to confront it
publication.page.subject
Citation
Galindo Hervás, Alfonso (2026). ¿Quién dijo «aceleración»?Análisis de tres teorías y tres propuestas sobre la aceleración social. Recerca. Revista de Pensamenti Anàlisi, 31(1), pp. 1-26.
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/