Publication: Larga vida a la tragedia: ensayo sobre la tragedia y la revolución
Authors
Ramos Colás, Álvaro
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
En este ensayo se intenta explorar
la relación entre tragedia, política y revolución,
en especial los aportes de la escuela culturalista
británica. En respuesta a la tesis de la muerte de
la tragedia (sostenida por Steiner, entre otros),
Raymond Williams defiende la necesidad de la
revolución como arma política y la importancia
de la tragedia para su consecución. Terry Eagleton
asume la necesidad de la revolución y la impor-
tancia de la tragedia, pero recurre a las categorías
lacanianas para marcar diferencias con su maestro
Williams. Clark aporta una visión personal y crí-
tica respecto a ambos.
In this essay, I explore the relation between tragedy, politics and revolution, spe- cially through the British culturalist thought. Raymond Williams, responding the death of the tragedy thesis (Steiner among others), defends the necessity of revolution as a political means, and the importance of tragedy to carry it out. Terry Eagleton assumes the necessity of revolution and the importance of tragedy, but disagree with him about his humanist optimism. The turn Eagleton proposes is based upon the three lacanian cate- gories. Clark’s position lays somewhere between Williams and Eagleton, since he is able to sustain a critical approach to both.
In this essay, I explore the relation between tragedy, politics and revolution, spe- cially through the British culturalist thought. Raymond Williams, responding the death of the tragedy thesis (Steiner among others), defends the necessity of revolution as a political means, and the importance of tragedy to carry it out. Terry Eagleton assumes the necessity of revolution and the importance of tragedy, but disagree with him about his humanist optimism. The turn Eagleton proposes is based upon the three lacanian cate- gories. Clark’s position lays somewhere between Williams and Eagleton, since he is able to sustain a critical approach to both.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.