Publication: Uncommon ground y pluralidad de actos de habla en polílogos online
Authors
Machioni Spagnol, Catarina
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.612061
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
¿Cómo los colectivos argumentan y por qué hay tantos desacuerdos? Tal como explican Lewiński y Aakhus, el modelo tradicional de argumentación, que reduce las múltiples posiciones expresadas en las redes sociales a una dicotomía de proponente versus oponente, es insuficiente para solucionar racionalmente nuestros desacuerdos porque no captura la realidad polilógica presente en las comunicaciones online a gran escala. Utilizando ejemplos de discusión en X (anteriormente conocida como Twitter) debido a su capacidad para generar interacciones públicas amplias y diversas, en este artículo propongo que las múltiples posiciones reflejan la diversidad de creencia e intenciones de los participantes, organizándose en clusters de actos de habla que emergen del uncommon ground (falta de información compartida sobre el mundo)
How do collectives argue and why are there so many disagreements? As Lewiński and Aakhus explain, the traditional model of argumentation, which reduces the multiple posi-tions expressed on social media to a dichotomy of proponent versus opponent, is insufficient for rationally resolving our disagreements because it does not capture the polylogical reality pre-sent in large-scale online communications. Using examples of discussions on X (formerly known as Twitter) due to its capacity to generate broad and diverse public interactions, this article proposes that the multiple positions reflect the diversity of beliefs and intentions among participants, organi-zing into clusters of speech acts that emerge from the uncommon ground (lack of shared informa-tion about the world).
How do collectives argue and why are there so many disagreements? As Lewiński and Aakhus explain, the traditional model of argumentation, which reduces the multiple posi-tions expressed on social media to a dichotomy of proponent versus opponent, is insufficient for rationally resolving our disagreements because it does not capture the polylogical reality pre-sent in large-scale online communications. Using examples of discussions on X (formerly known as Twitter) due to its capacity to generate broad and diverse public interactions, this article proposes that the multiple positions reflect the diversity of beliefs and intentions among participants, organi-zing into clusters of speech acts that emerge from the uncommon ground (lack of shared informa-tion about the world).
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº. 93, 2024, pp. 91-117
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/