Publication: Affective Assessment of High and Low-Density Residential
and Functional Environments
Authors
Tomás, Rafael ; Amérigo, María ; Aragones, Juan Ignacio
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El presente trabajo contrasta ambientes residenciales versus
funcionales de alta y baja densidad a través de la valoración del agrado y la
activación que dichos ambientes elicitan. Así mismo se exploran las relacio-
nes entre estas dimensiones afectivas y una medida de bienestar emocional
y rasgos de personalidad. 238 estudiantes universitarios valoraron el nivel
de agrado y activación elicitado por una serie de imágenes que representa-
ban ambientes residenciales y funcionales de alta y baja densidad. Los resul-
tados ponen de manifiesto que, independientemente de la densidad, los
ambientes residenciales generan sentimientos más agradables que los espa-
cios funcionales; no obstante, y en relación con la activación, los sentimien-
tos generados por ambientes residenciales y funcionales, varían en función
de la densidad. Se concluye que los ambientes residenciales se constituyen
en entornos más adaptativos en términos de bienestar emocional.
This paper contrasts high and low-density residential and func- tional environments through an assessment of the pleasure and arousal said environments elicit. The relationships between these affective dimensions and a measure of emotional well-being and personality traits are also ex- plored. Two hundred thirty-eight university students assessed the degree of pleasure and arousal elicited by a series of images depicting high and low- density residential and functional environments. The findings clearly reveal that residential environments produce more pleasurable feelings than func- tional spaces, regardless of their density. However, as regards arousal, the feelings produced by residential and functional environments vary on de- pending on their density. It concludes that residential environments are more adaptable environments in terms of emotional well-being.
This paper contrasts high and low-density residential and func- tional environments through an assessment of the pleasure and arousal said environments elicit. The relationships between these affective dimensions and a measure of emotional well-being and personality traits are also ex- plored. Two hundred thirty-eight university students assessed the degree of pleasure and arousal elicited by a series of images depicting high and low- density residential and functional environments. The findings clearly reveal that residential environments produce more pleasurable feelings than func- tional spaces, regardless of their density. However, as regards arousal, the feelings produced by residential and functional environments vary on de- pending on their density. It concludes that residential environments are more adaptable environments in terms of emotional well-being.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.