Publication:
A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Four Field-Based Trunk Extension Endurance Tests

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorde Ste Croix, Mark
dc.contributor.authorVera-García, Francisco J
dc.contributor.authorAyala Rodríguez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Romero, María Teresa
dc.contributor.authorSainz de Baranda Andújar, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorSantonja Medina, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Meca, Julio
dc.contributor.departmentActividad Física y Deporte
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-15T12:15:39Z
dc.date.available2025-01-15T12:15:39Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-29
dc.description© 2020 Authors. This document is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This document is the published version of a published work that appeared in final form in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health To access the final edited and published work see: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093088
dc.description.abstractThis meta-analysis aimed to estimate the inter- and intra-tester reliability of endurance measures obtained through trunk extension field-based tests and to explore the influence of the moderators on the reliability estimates. The reliability induction rate of trunk extension endurance measures was also calculated. A systematic search was conducted using various databases, and subsequently 28 studies were selected that reported intraclass correlation coefficients for trunk extension endurance measures. Separate meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. When possible, analyses of potential moderator variables were carried out. The inter-tester average reliability of the endurance measure obtained from the Biering-Sorensen test was intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)= 0.94. The intra-session reliability estimates of the endurance measures recorded using the Biering-Sorensen test, the prone isometric chest raise test, and the prone double straight-leg test were ICC= 0.88, 0.90, and 0.86, respectively. The inter-session average reliability of the endurance measures from the Biering-Sorensen test, the prone isometric chest raise test, and the dynamic extensor endurance test were ICC= 0.88, 0.95, and 0.99, respectively. However, due to the limited evidence available, the reliability estimates of the measures obtained through the prone isometric chest raise, prone double straight-leg, and dynamic extensor endurance tests should be considered with a degree of caution. Position control instruments, tools, and familiarization session demonstrated a statistical association with the inter-session reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test. The reliability induction rate was 72.8%. Only the trunk extension endurance measure obtained through the Biering-Sorensen test presented sufficient scientific evidence in terms of reliability to justify its use for research and practical purposes.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent21es
dc.identifier.citationInt. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3088
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093088
dc.identifier.issnPrint.: 1661-7827
dc.identifier.issnElectronic.: 1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/148481
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.relationThis research was funded by a predoctoral grant awarded by the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (grant number: FPU15/05200). This study is part of the project entitled “Study of risk of injury in young athletes through artificial intelligence networks” (DEP2017-88775-P), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and Universities, the State Research Agency (AEI) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). This study was carried out during the research stay at the School of Sport and Exercise of the University of Gloucestershire from 01/05/2018 to 01/08/2018 funded by the Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/703574es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectReliability generalization meta-analysises
dc.subjectCore endurancees
dc.subjectPhysical educationes
dc.subjectSports performancees
dc.subjectPre-participation assessmentes
dc.titleA Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Four Field-Based Trunk Extension Endurance Testses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationb7107074-d6d7-4a29-8d0a-1772fdc06132
relation.isAuthorOfPublication464d237b-749b-459b-b268-a68fd6b381ec
relation.isAuthorOfPublication22d0ed46-3f59-457b-9edf-2d832f8b8b82
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7bb6114e-b685-4aae-b8bb-4a4d04f191c6
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7a7ea857-99bb-4d09-882b-0cf9064c04d9
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryb7107074-d6d7-4a29-8d0a-1772fdc06132
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2020-meta-analysis.pdf
Size:
2.54 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos