Publication: La noción plural de sujeto de justicia.
Un nuevo reto para la filosofía.
Loading...
Date
2010
Authors
De Tienda Palop, Lidia
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Pensar el futuro de la justicia no sólo
entraña reflexionar acerca de la pregunta, que se
ha considerado propiamente su objeto: ¿Qué es
lo que se debe?, sino que requiere retrotraernos a
una cuestión más original: ¿A quién se debe? Las
teorías del contrato social, con especial relevancia
la propuesta rawlsiana, han tenido una notable
impronta en las concepciones de la justicia contemporáneas.
Algunas de las críticas más poderosas
a estas teorías son las llevadas a cabo por
Walzer, al integrar el elemento plural en la propia
estructura de la justicia y por Martha Nussbaum,
al poner de manifiesto la importancia de concebir
un sujeto de justicia plural. Al paso dado por estos
autores se le suma uno nuevo: el reconocer la pluralidad
de los vínculos de cohesión social, si se
desea una teoría de la justicia solvente.
Thinking the future of Justice implies not only answering the question, considered its object: what is it due?, but another more original: To whom is it due? Theories of Social contract, specially the rawlsian, have a great influence on contemporary models of justice. Some of the most powerful critics are the ones held by Walzer, who integrates the plurality in the very structure of the justice, and by Nussbaum, who emphasizes the importance of grasping the subject of justice as plural. A new step is needed: recognizing the plurality in the social links, if we wish a reliable theory of justice.
Thinking the future of Justice implies not only answering the question, considered its object: what is it due?, but another more original: To whom is it due? Theories of Social contract, specially the rawlsian, have a great influence on contemporary models of justice. Some of the most powerful critics are the ones held by Walzer, who integrates the plurality in the very structure of the justice, and by Nussbaum, who emphasizes the importance of grasping the subject of justice as plural. A new step is needed: recognizing the plurality in the social links, if we wish a reliable theory of justice.
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.