Person: Tortajada Gomariz, Miriam
Loading...
Name
Tortajada Gomariz, Miriam
publication.page.department
Universidad de Murcia. Departamento de Psicología Básica
- Publications
- item.page.relationships.isSecondaryAuthorOfPublication
- item.page.relationships.isDirectorOfPublication
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- PublicationOpen AccessTesting the modulation of self-related automatic and others-related controlled processing by chronotype and time-of-day(Elsevier, 2024-01-09) Palmero Jara, Lucía Beatriz; Tortajada Gomariz, Miriam; Campoy Menéndez, Guillermo; Fuentes Melero, Luis José; Martínez Pérez, Víctor; Psicología Básica y MetodologíaWe assessed whether self-related automatic and others-related controlled processes are modulated by chronotype and time-of-day. Here, a shape-label matching task composed of three geometrical shapes arbitrarily associated with you, friend, and stranger was used. Twenty Morning-types, and twenty Evening-types performed the task at the optimal and non-optimal times of day (i.e., 8 AM, or 8:30 PM). Morning-types did not exhibit noticeable synchrony effects, thus proving the better adaptation of these participants to non-optimal moments of the day as compared to Evening-types. Contrary to our predictions regarding the absence of automatic-processing modulation and the presence of controlled-processing influences by time-of-day, we found an influence on self-related but not others-related processing only in Evening-type participants. Although brain structures are not directly tackled, we argue that such modulation may be due to the dependence of the activation of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC), an essential component of the self-attention network on circadian rhythms.
- PublicationOpen AccessMid-luteal phase progesterone effects on vigilance tasks are modulated by women’s chronotype(Elsevier, 2022-03-12) Palmero Jara, Lucía Beatriz; Tortajada Gomariz, Miriam; Campoy Menéndez, Guillermo; Fuentes Melero, Luis José; Martínez Pérez, Víctor; Psicología Básica y MetodologíaBackground In this study we assessed the effects of progesterone on vigilance tasks that require sustained attention. In contrast to previous research, we differentiated two components of vigilance: the exogenous component, involved in monotonous and tedious tasks such as the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT); and the endogenous component, involved in tasks that require cognitive control such as the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART). Methods A sample of 32 female participants differing in extreme chronotypes were tested at their optimal and non-optimal time-of-day, as secretion of sex hormones follows biological rhythms. Ovulation tests that measure the presence of luteinizing hormone (LH) in urine were used to minimize methodological errors. Women of Morning-type or Evening-type chronotypes completed 4 experimental sessions of the two attentional tasks when they were in their follicular (low progesterone level) and mid-luteal (high progesterone level) phases, both in the morning (8:00 AM) and the evening (8:30 PM). Results Compared with the follicular phase, performance in the mid-luteal phase improved in the Morning-type participants and worsened in the Evening-type participants. This pattern of results was observed only when testing occurred at the optimal time-of-day and with both the PVT and the SART tasks. Conclusion These results suggest that the simultaneous presence of both progesterone and cortisol at 8:00 AM may explain the benefit observed in Morning-type females. In contrast, the low concentration of cortisol along with the reduced benefit of mid-luteal phase progesterone in the evening may account for the worsening in performance observed in Evening-type females.
- PublicationOpen AccessTransparency in Cognitive Training Meta-analyses: A Meta-review(Springer Nature, 2024-04-19) López Nicolás, Rubén; Sandoval Lentisco, Alejandro; Tortajada Gomariz, Miriam; López López, José Antonio; Sánchez Meca, Julio; Psicología Básica y Metodología; Facultad de Psicología y LogopediaMeta-analyses often present flexibility regarding their inclusion criteria, outcomes of interest, statistical analyses, and assessments of the primary studies. For this reason, it is necessary to transparently report all the information that could impact the results. In this meta-review, we aimed to assess the transparency of meta-analyses that examined the benefits of cognitive training, given the ongoing controversy that exists in this field. Ninety-seven meta-analytic reviews were included, which examined a wide range of populations with different clinical conditions and ages. Regarding the reporting, information about the search of the studies, screening procedure, or data collection was detailed by most reviews. However, authors usually failed to report other aspects such as the specific meta-analytic parameters, the formula used to compute the effect sizes, or the data from primary studies that were used to compute the effect sizes. Although some of these practices have improved over the years, others remained the same. Moreover, examining the eligibility criteria of the reviews revealed a great heterogeneity in aspects such as the training duration, age cut-offs, or study designs that were considered. Preregistered meta-analyses often specified poorly how they would deal with the multiplicity of data or assess publication bias in their protocols, and some contained non-disclosed deviations in their eligibility criteria or outcomes of interests. The findings shown here, although they do not question the benefits of cognitive training, illustrate important aspects that future reviews must consider.
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.


