Browsing by Subject "Community-acquired pneumonia"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- PublicationOpen AccessC-Reactive protein levels in community acquired pneumonia(European Respiratory Society (ERS), 2002-10-24) García-Vázquez, Elisa; Martínez, J.A.; Mensa, J.; Sánchez, F.; Marcos, M.A.; Roux, A. de; Torres, A.; MedicinaThe diagnostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP) admission serum levels as an indicator of the aetiology of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) was evaluated. A cohort of 1,222 patients with CAP was assessed. CRP levels were analysed in 258 patients with a single aetiological diagnosis. The mean CRP values in patients with pyogenic, atypical, viral and Legionella pneumophila pneumonia were: 16 mg?dL-1 , 13 mg?dL-1 , 14 mg?dL -1 and 25 mg?dL-1 , respectively. CRP levels were not significantly different among patients outcome research team (PORT) groups (19 mg?dL -1 in groups I–II, 16 mg?dL-1 in group III and 16 mg?dL -1 in groups IV–V. A cut-off point of 25 mg?dL-1 had a sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.6, 0.83, 0.3, and 0.94, respectively. After controlling for age and PORT score, the odds of having a CRP level w25 mg?dL-1 was 6.9 times higher in patients with L. pneumophila pneumonia than in those with non-L. pneumophila pneumonia. Patients with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia had higher C-reactive protein levels than those with pneumonia of any other aetiology, independently of severity of infection. Being a cheap and readily available test, C-reactive protein may be a useful adjunctive procedure in the diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia.
- PublicationRestrictedRapid urinary antigen test for diagnosis of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in adults(ERS Journals, 2003) Marcos, M.A.; Jiménez de Anta, M.T.; Bellacasa, J.P. de la; González, J.; Martínez, E.; García-Vázquez, Elisa; Mensa, J.; Roux, A. de; Torres, A.; MedicinaStreptococcus pneumoniae is suspected to cause an important proportion of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) whose aetiology cannot be detected withconventional tests. In this study, the authors evaluated the diagnostic yield of a new immunochromatographic membrane test (ICT) for the detection of the S. pneumoniae antigen in the urine of patients admitted with diagnosed CAP. ICT was performed in unconcentrated and concentrated urine from all the patients. ICT was repeated 1 month after discharge in a group initially testing positive. The authors also studied the ICT in clinically stable human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV1)-infected patients. S. pneumoniae antigen was detected in all of the 68 (100%) patients tested with definitive pneumococcal pneumonia. In five of these cases ICT was only positive when it had been performed on the patients. The S. pneumoniae antigen was also detected in 36 (69.2%) of 52 patients with probable pneumococcal pneumonia and in 50 of 277 (18%) patients without pneumococcal pneumonia. ICT remained positive in 16 (69.5%) of 23 patients, 1 month after hospital discharge. Nasopharyngeal colonisation with S. pneumoniae was detected in 8 (12%) of 68 clinically stable HIV1 infected patients, but none tested ICT positive. The Binax NOW1 immunochromatographic membrane test is a rapid, sensitive and specific test for detecting pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in adults. The test may remain positive for several weeks after pneumococcal pneumonia.
- PublicationRestrictedViral community-acquired pneumonia in nonimmunocompromised adults(Elsevier, 2004) Roux, Andrés de; Marcos, Maria A.; García-Vázquez, Elisa; Mensa, Jose; Ewig, Santiago; Lode, Hartmut; Torres, Antoni; MedicinaIntroduction: Viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has been poorly studied and clinically characterized. Using strict criteria for inclusion, we studied this type of infection in a large series of hospitalized adults with CAP. Materials and methods: All nonimmunocompromised adult patients with a diagnosis of CAP having paired serology for respiratory viruses (RVs) [338 patients] were prospectively included in the study from 1996 to 2001 at our 1,000-bed university teaching hospital, and subsequently were followed up. We compared patients with pure viral (PV), mixed viral (RV + bacteria), and pneumococcal CAP. RVs (ie, influenza, parainfluenza, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenovirus) were diagnosed by means of paired serology. Results: Sixty-one of 338 patients (18%) with paired serology had an RV detected, and in 31 cases (9%) it was the only pathogen identified. Influenza was the most frequent virus detected (39 patients; 64%). Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) had an increased risk of acquiring PV CAP (8 of 26 patients; 31%) when compared to a mixed viral/bacterial etiology (2 of 26 patients; 8%; p = 0.035) or CAP caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (1 of 44 patients; 2%; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that CHF (odds ratio [OR], 15.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 163; p = 0.024) and the absence of expectoration (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.6; p = 0.006) were associated with PV pneumonia compared to pneumococcal CAP. Conclusion: RVs are frequent etiologies of CAP (single or in combination with bacteria). Patients with CHF have an increased risk of acquiring a viral CAP.