Browsing by Subject "Bone implantation"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Morphological changes of autoclaved autogenic bone implantation and autoclaved autogenic bone supplernented with allogenic demineralized bone matrix in rat parietal bone
    (Murcia : F. Hernández, 1996) Young, T.Q.; Matsuda, Mikio; Takekawa, M.; Ohtsubo, S.; Tsuyama, K.; Kita, S.
    The healing process of resected, autoclaved (121 7,20 minutes) and re-implanted bone in the rat parietal bone was compared with that of autoclaved bone that was supplemented with allogenic bone matrix (AAA-bone), using a scanning electron microscope and a light microscope. In the implant without AAA-bone, bone union and replacement of the autoclaved bone was seen at 2 weeks after implantation. There was no evidence of any inflammatory reaction around the autoclaved bone. The implant was gradually replaced by the new bone. In the implant with AAA-bone, the new bone formation around the implanted bone was more abundant than that of the implant without AAA-bone. An inflammatory reaction was also observed after 1 week. The replacement of the implant with AAA-bone was inferior to the nonsupplemented group. The reason for the poor replacement was the disturbance of the blood supply in the implant by abundant new bone formation. In these results, the autoclaved bone re-implantation was an excellent bone substitute with osteoconductive ability and biocompatibility. The implantation with AAA-bone was good for the new bone formation, but the position and the technique of supplement with AAAbone have to be more deeply investigated.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Scanning electron microscopic and light microscopic observations on morphological changes of freeze-dried bone implantation in rats
    (Murcia : F. Hernández, 1992) Matsuda, Mikio; Satoh, Y.; Ono, K.
    Bone remodelling after the implantation of freeze-dried autogenous bone in rat parietal bone was compared with fresh autogenous bone transplantation, using a scanning electron and light microscope revealed the time intervals after transplantationfimplantation. The light microscope revealed the time delay of the bone remodelling in the implantation, compared with the transplantations. The scanning electron microscope showed that the differences between the two groups were in the states of bone union and bone resorption. In the fresh bone group, the newly-formed bone filled the spaces between host and the transplanted bones at 2 to 3 weeks after the transplantation: the newly-formed bone fused and melted into the transplanted bone. New bone formation was more dominant on the bone surface in the dura mater side than in the skin side. The union was almost completed at 5 weeks. In freeze-dried bone implantation, the bone union in the contact space was very poor and the implanted bone was mainly covered by the new bone, which developed from the host bone surface in the dura mater side at 2 to 3 weeks after the implantation. What is noteworthy is that bone resorbed areas showing numerous Howship's lacunae were mainly observed on the host bone surface in the vicinity of newly-formed bone. However in freeze-dried bone implantation, the bone resorption was greater on the host and implanted bone surface than that of fresh bone transplantation: the resorption of host bone was considerably larger at certain periods after freeze-dried bone implantation. The present results show that the healing process of freeze-dried bone implantation, even though autogenous bone was used, differed from that of fresh autogenous bone transplantation, and the differences are concerned not only with time sequences but also with qualitative changes. This suggests that the host would have some different responses to the freeze-dried autogenous bone from fresh materials.