Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • Statistics
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Biological effects"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Restricted
    Topical fluoride varnishes promote several biological responses on human gingival cells
    (Elsevier, 2021-04-18) López García, Sergio; Pecci Lloret, María Pilar; Pecci Lloret, Miguel Ramón; Guerrero Gironés, Julia; Rodríguez Lozano, Francisco Javier; García Bernal, David; Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
    Objective: To compare the in vitro cytotoxicity of four commercial topical fluoride varnishes widely used in daily dental practice for the prevention of caries on human fibroblasts: Cervitec F, Fixofluor, Fluor Protector S and Duraphat. Material and methods: Human gingival fibroblasts (hGF) were exposed to different concentrations of fluoride varnishes extracts. Biological assays, including MTT and IC50 value determination, annexin-V/7- AAD staining, cell migration and F-actin staining with phalloidin were carried out. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. Results: At 4% concentration, all of the fluoride varnishes extracts affected fibroblasts metabolic activity, exhibiting ahighdegree of cytotoxicity at allmeasured time points.At 0.1%and 1%, Duraphat and Fixofluor or Fluor Protector S and Cervitec F exerted the lowest or highest cytotoxic effects, respectively. Similar effects were evidenced when induction of apoptosis/necrosis and cell migration assays were analyzed. Immunocytochemical assays revealed a similarnumber offibroblasts, without changes inthemorphology and F-actin content at 0.1% concentration of alltested materials, while at 1% concentration, Fluor Protector S and Cervitec F showed few cells with aberrant morphology or non-adhered cells, respectively. Conclusions: Different commercial topical fluoride varnishes with the same therapeutic indication may exhibit different biological effects and cytotoxicity on fibroblasts.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback