Browsing by Subject "Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- PublicationOpen AccessAnaplastic thyroid carcinoma: Updates on WHO classification, clinicopathological features and staging(Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Biologia Celular e Histiologia, 2021) Abe, Ichiro; King-yin Lam, AlfredAnaplastic thyroid carcinoma is an uncommon carcinoma representing 1 to 4% of all thyroid cancers. The carcinoma is most common in females of the eight decades. It is a locally advanced cancer with frequent infiltration of surrounding organs, blood vessels and skin of neck. Paraneoplastic manifestations could occur. Approximately half of the patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma had distant metastasis with lung and brain as the most frequent sites of metastasis. The median survival of patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma reported was from 1 to 6 months. The terminology of the cancer in World Health Organization is "anaplastic thyroid carcinoma" rather than "undifferentiated thyroid carcinoma". In the latest American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, there are updates on T and N categories. To conclude, updated knowledge of clinicopathological features, classification, pathological staging will improve our understanding of the cancer and will help in the management of the patients with this aggressive cancer.
- PublicationOpen AccessTargeting PEAK1 sensitizes anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells harboring BRAFV600E to Vemurafenib by Bim upregulation(Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Biologia Celular e Histiologia, 2024) Wang, Qiuhan; Hao, Fengyun; Ning, Liang; Sun, ChongPseudopodium-enriched atypical kinase 1 (PEAK1) has been demonstrated to be upregulated in human malignancies and cells. Enhanced PEAK1 expression facilitates tumor cell survival and chemoresistance. However, the role of PEAK1 inhibition to anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cell (ATC) and vemurafenib resistance is still unknown. Here, we observed that targeting PEAK1 inhibited cell viability and colony formation, but not cell apoptosis in both of the 8505C and Hth74 cells in vitro. Targeting PEAK1 sensitized 8505C and Hth74 cells to Vemurafenib by inducing cell apoptosis, and thereby decreasing cell viability. Mechanistically, Vemurafenib treatment upregulated PEAK1 expression. Combined PEAK1 depletion and Vemurafenib treatment upregulated Bim expression. Targeting PEAK1 sensitized Vemurafenib-induced apoptosis by upregulating Bim. In conclusion, Vemurafenib resistance in ATC cells harboring BRAFV600E is associated with PEAK1 activation, resulting in the inhibition of pro-apoptotic Bim protein. Therefore, targeting PEAK1 may be an effective strategy to sensitize ATC harboring BRAFV600E to Vemurafenib.