Publication:
Microleakage of conventional light-cure resin-based fissure sealant and resin-modified glass ionomer sealant after application of a fluoride varnish on demineralized enamel

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGermán Cecilia, Concepción
dc.contributor.authorGallego Reyes, Sandra María
dc.contributor.authorPérez Silva, Amparo
dc.contributor.authorSerna Muñoz, Clara
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Ruiz, Antonio José
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T07:22:01Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T07:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-11
dc.description© 2018 Germán-Cecilia et al. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in PLoS ONE. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208856
dc.description.abstractBackground International guidelines on the prevention of caries recommend sealing of the pits and fissures of the permanent molars. There is no evidence on which type of material is most effective on demineralized enamel. Aim To evaluate the microleakage of a conventional light-cured, resin-based fissure sealant (LCRBS), GrandiO Seal, and a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant (RMGIS), Vitremer, after application of a fluoride varnish, Bifluorid 12, on demineralized enamel. Design 80 human third molars were divided into eight groups. The groups combined the three study factors (1) type of enamel (intact or demineralized); (2) enamel non-varnished or varnished with Biflourid12; and (3) type of sealant (GrandiO Seal or Vitremer). The percentage of microleakage after thermocycling was measured using imaging analysis software. The Kruskal-Wallis plus Dunn tests were used to compare differences in microleakage in the different groups. Results The lowest microleakage was in the unvarnished groups, and was the same for GrandiO Seal and Vitremer. When varnish was applied, microleakage was greater in demineralized enamel than in intact enamel for both LCRBS and RMGIS. Conclusion The application of fluoride varnish on demineralized enamel increases the microleakage of both GrandiO Seal and Vitremer.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent10es
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2018, Vol. 13 (12), e 0208856
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208856
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/142623
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherPublic Library of Sciencees
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0208856
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleMicroleakage of conventional light-cure resin-based fissure sealant and resin-modified glass ionomer sealant after application of a fluoride varnish on demineralized enameles
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
file.pdf
Size:
1.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos