Publication: Asambleas ciudadanas y reformas constitucionales en
Islandia e Irlanda: sorteo y deliberación como instrumentos
de profundización democrática
Authors
Camarelles Queralt, Gabriel
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.428891
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El objetivo de este artículo es explorar
y reflexionar sobre el potencial de las asambleas
ciudadanas, y observar si tienen o no la capacidad
de influir en la toma de decisiones políticas. En
primer lugar, se realiza una mirada crítica a las
asambleas ciudadanas. A continuación, se presentan
los procesos de reformas constitucionales de
Islandia e Irlanda. Para terminar, se analizan las
potencialidades y limitaciones de dichas asambleas
ciudadanas constituyentes. La conclusión
expone que, aunque los resultados fueron dispares,
son un buen referente de cómo la ciudadanía
común puede participar en la agenda política.
The objective of this article is to explore and reflect on the potential of citizen assemblies, and to observe whether or not they have the capacity to influence political decisionmaking. In the first place, a critical look is made of the citizen assemblies. The following are the constitutional reform processes in Iceland and Ireland. Finally, the potentialities and limitations of these constituent citizen assemblies are analyzed. The conclusion states that, although the results were uneven, they are a good reference for how common citizenship can participate in the political agenda.
The objective of this article is to explore and reflect on the potential of citizen assemblies, and to observe whether or not they have the capacity to influence political decisionmaking. In the first place, a critical look is made of the citizen assemblies. The following are the constitutional reform processes in Iceland and Ireland. Finally, the potentialities and limitations of these constituent citizen assemblies are analyzed. The conclusion states that, although the results were uneven, they are a good reference for how common citizenship can participate in the political agenda.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº 88 (2023), pp. 7-21
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/