Publication:
Brothers in arms: Virtue and pragma-dialectics

Thumbnail Image
Files
Argumentation2017.pdf(212.46 KB)
Date
2017
relationships.isAuthorOfPublication
relationships.isSecondaryAuthorOf
relationships.isDirectorOf
Authors
Gascón, José Ángel
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
Filosofía
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9423-0
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint
Description
©<2017>. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This document is the Accepted, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Argumentation. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9423-0
Abstract
Virtue argumentation theory focuses on the arguers’ character, whereas pragmadialectics focuses on argumentation as a procedure. In this paper I attempt to explain that both theories are not opposite approaches to argumentation. I argue that, with the help of some nonfundamental changes in pragma-dialectics and some restrictions in virtue argumentation theory, it is possible to regard these theories as complementary approaches to the argumentative practice.
publication.page.subject
Argumentation , Bias , Conventional validity , Practice , Pragma-dialectics , Problem-validity , Rules , Virtue
Citation
Argumentation 31, 705–724 (2017)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138484
item.page.embargo
Collections
Artículos
Ir a Estadísticas