Publication:
On howtrap positioning affects phlebotomine sand fly density estimations

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, C.
dc.contributor.authorPérez Cutillas, P.
dc.contributor.authorBerriatua, E.
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Sánchez, Juana
dc.contributor.departmentSanidad Animal
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-18T12:28:48Z
dc.date.available2024-12-18T12:28:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-09
dc.description© 2020 The Royal Entomological Society. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Medical and Veterinary Entomology. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12501
dc.description.abstractThere is a need for standardizing sand fly sampling methodology and guidance on trap positioning for quantitative sand fly studies. We investigated differences in sand fly density with ‘sticky’ interception and CO2-light attraction traps, in relation to trap distance to the ground and the presence or absence of a continuous or discontinuous (wire mesh) vertical surface adjacent to the trap. The study, conducted in a dog kennel in southeast Spain, lasted 48 days and collected 692 Phlebotomus papatasi, P. perniciosus, P. ariasi and Sergentomyia minuta specimens. There were no significant differences between species with respect to trap position. Overall, density in sticky traps was highest closest to the ground and next to the continuous vertical surface, followed sequentially by traps similarly placed adjacent to the wire mesh and those hanging from a rope across the kennel yard. In contrast, density in CO2-light traps was highest in traps hanging from the rope near the ground, followed by those next to the continuous vertical surface. The overall negative relationship between sand fly density and ground distance was not significant for CO2-light traps next to the continuous vertical surface. Modelling also suggested that sand flies do not use the wire mesh to move vertically.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent5es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12501
dc.identifier.eisbnMedical and Veterinary Entomology, 2021, Vol. 35, N. 3, pp. 490–494es
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0269-283X
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1365-2915
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/147639
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationThe study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Grant number: AGL2013-46981-R). CM held PhD grants from University of Murcia (‘Contrato predoctoral FPU’ and ‘Ayudas de Iniciación a la Investigación para 2015’).es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://resjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mve.12501
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.subjectGround distancees
dc.subjectPhlebotomuses
dc.subjectPositioninges
dc.subjectSamplinges
dc.subjectSurfacees
dc.subjectTrapses
dc.titleOn howtrap positioning affects phlebotomine sand fly density estimationses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Medical Vet Entomology - 2020 - Muñoz - On how trap positioning affects phlebotomine sand fly density estimations.pdf
Size:
6.52 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Informes o documentos de trabajo