Publication: Heidegger en torno al error de la modernidad: la crítica al dualismo cartesiano de cuerpo y alma (Sein und Zeit,
parágrafos 19, 20, 21)
Authors
Gilabert, Fernando
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon/268651
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
A partir del pensamiento presentado
por Martin Heidegger en Sein und Zeit, podemos
elaborar una crítica a la Modernidad filosófica.
A nuestro juicio, los presupuestos de esa Modernidad parten del error cartesiano de la dualidad
del mundo en dos dominios: la res extensa y la
res cogitans, el cuerpo y el alma. A partir de ese
error, la filosofía deriva en una ciencia del ente,
que no tiene en cuenta al ser, núcleo del pensar
filosófico. A partir del concepto heideggeriano de
Dasein podemos mostrar como no hay tal dualidad y como es necesario un giro radical en la
filosofía.
As of thought presente by Martin Heidegger in Sein und Zeit, we can develop a critique of philosophical Modernity. In our view, the budgets of the Modernity starts of the Cartesian mistake of the duality of the world in two domains: res extensa and res cogitans, body and soul. From that mistake, philosophy leads to a science of being, which does not considerer the Being, core of philosophical thinking. From Heidegger’s concept of Dasein we can show how there is no such duality and as a radical change is necessary in philosophy.
As of thought presente by Martin Heidegger in Sein und Zeit, we can develop a critique of philosophical Modernity. In our view, the budgets of the Modernity starts of the Cartesian mistake of the duality of the world in two domains: res extensa and res cogitans, body and soul. From that mistake, philosophy leads to a science of being, which does not considerer the Being, core of philosophical thinking. From Heidegger’s concept of Dasein we can show how there is no such duality and as a radical change is necessary in philosophy.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 2016, Suplemento 5, pp. 89-98
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.