Publication: La evaluación del profesorado universitario mediante la acreditación : una revisión sistemática
Authors
Hinojo Lucena, Francisco Javier ; Lara Lara, Fernando ; Juan Carlos de la, Cruz Campos ; Ramos Navas-Parejo, Magdalena
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Zaragoza, Asociación Universitaria de Formación del Profesorado (AUFOP)
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v98i37.1.98208
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El sistema de Educación Superior español ha sufrido un
proceso de transformación considerable en los últimos
años, afectando a la forma de evaluar el acceso y la
promoción de su profesorado, destacando como principal
figura de evaluación externa a la ANECA y la implantación
de las agencias autonómicas. El objetivo principal de este
trabajo es analizar los desafíos actuales de la acreditación,
perspectivas de futuro, propuestas de mejora y discusiones
sobre la calidad de la misma. Para ello se ha seguido la
metodología propia de las revisiones sistemáticas,
siguiendo las recomendaciones PRISMA. Los resultados
muestran un total de 9 artículos indexados en WoS, Scopus
y Dialnet, en los que se observa que, en su mayoría, se
muestran críticos con el sistema de acreditación. Se
concluye afirmando que las reformas de las leyes
universitarias afectan a los criterios de selección y
promoción del personal docente, y que influyen a su vez a
la cultura de investigación y evaluación universitaria.
Existe una preocupación entre los investigadores porque
este sistema, centrado en ANECA y agencias autonómicas,
sea lo más objetivo, claro y transparente posible, además
de diversificado en competencias profesionales, adecuado
a cada área del conocimiento y que aspire a una evaluación
igualitaria.
The Spanish Higher Education system has undergone a considerable transformation process in recent years, affecting the way of evaluating the access and promotion of its teaching staff, with ANECA as the main external evaluation figure and the implementation of regional agencies. The main objective of this work is to analyze the current challenges of accreditation, future prospects, proposals for improvement and discussions on the quality of accreditation. To this end, the methodology of systematic reviews has been followed, following the PRISMA recommendations. The results show a total of 9 articles indexed in WoS, Scopus and Dialnet, most of which are critical of the accreditation system. The conclusion is that the reforms of the university laws affect the criteria for selection and promotion of teaching staff, and that this in turn influences the culture of university research and evaluation. There is concern among researchers that this system, centered on ANECA and autonomous agencies, should be as objective, clear and transparent as possible, as well as diversified in professional competencies, appropriate to each area of knowledge and aspiring to equal evaluation.
The Spanish Higher Education system has undergone a considerable transformation process in recent years, affecting the way of evaluating the access and promotion of its teaching staff, with ANECA as the main external evaluation figure and the implementation of regional agencies. The main objective of this work is to analyze the current challenges of accreditation, future prospects, proposals for improvement and discussions on the quality of accreditation. To this end, the methodology of systematic reviews has been followed, following the PRISMA recommendations. The results show a total of 9 articles indexed in WoS, Scopus and Dialnet, most of which are critical of the accreditation system. The conclusion is that the reforms of the university laws affect the criteria for selection and promotion of teaching staff, and that this in turn influences the culture of university research and evaluation. There is concern among researchers that this system, centered on ANECA and autonomous agencies, should be as objective, clear and transparent as possible, as well as diversified in professional competencies, appropriate to each area of knowledge and aspiring to equal evaluation.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Revista interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, V. 37(1), N. 98, 2023
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/