Publication: Effect of Muscle Energy Technique versus Graston Technique onnon-specific neck pain
Authors
Elsayed, Mohamed ; Mohamed, Mohamed Ahmed ; Ali, Mohammad F. ; Dabash, Ghada R. ; El Din Taha, Taher Salah ; Abdelrahim, Reham M.
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.599011
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Antecedentes: Numerosas investigaciones se han llevado a cabo con el fin de determinar la estrategia de fisioterapia más eficaz para el tratamiento del dolor de cuello inespecífico (NSNP). Propósito: contrastar los resultados de la Técnica de Graston (GT) y la Técnica de Energía Muscular (MET) tanto en la intensidad del dolor como en la discapacidad funcional en pacientes con NSNP. Métodos: Cuarenta y dos (30 hombres y 12 mujeres) pacientes con NSNP divididos aleatoriamente en tres grupos: Grupo A: recibieron técnica de Graston y tratamiento de fisioterapia tradicional (TPT), Grupo B: recibieron técnica de energía muscular y TPT, y Grupo C: recibieron TPT solamente. La intervención tuvo una duración de 12 sesiones (3 por semana). Al inicio y al final de la cuarta semana, se utilizó una escala analógica visual para cuantificar la intensidad del dolor y un cuestionario de índice de discapacidad del cuello (NDI) para medir la discapacidad funcional. Resultados: Hubo efectos significativos de tiempo (pre/post) y grupo de intervención (Graston, MET, convencional) e interacción significativa sobre el dolor y la discapacidad (p<0,05). El grupo MET tuvo mayores cambios en el dolor que los grupos Graston y control (p<0,05). Sin embargo, no hubo diferencias significativas entre grupos en el cambio funcional. Conclusión: GT y MET tuvieron efectos similares sobre la función en pacientes con NSNP, pero MET tuvo efectos más altos sobre la reducción del dolor.
Background: Numerous researches have been carried out in order to determine the most effective physical therapy strategy for treating nonspecific neck pain (NSNP). Purpose: To contrast between the outcomes of Graston Technique (GT)and Muscle Energy Technique (MET)on both pain intensity and functional disability in patients with NSNP. Methods: Forty-two(30 males and 12 females) patients with NSNP divided randomly into three groups: Group A: received Graston Technique and traditional physiotherapy treatment (TPT), Group B: received muscle energy technique and TPT, and Group C: received TPT only. Intervention lasted for 12 sessions (3per week). At the start and finish of the fourth week, a visual analogue scale was used to quantify pain intensity and a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire was used to measure functional disability. Results: There were significant mean effects of time (pre/post) and intervention group (Graston, MET, conventional) and significant interaction on pain and disability (p<0.05). MET group had higher changes in the pain than both Graston and control groups (p<0.05). However, no significant differences among groups in the functional change. Conclusion: GT and MET had similar effects on the function in patients with NSNP, but MET had highereffects on reducing pain.
Background: Numerous researches have been carried out in order to determine the most effective physical therapy strategy for treating nonspecific neck pain (NSNP). Purpose: To contrast between the outcomes of Graston Technique (GT)and Muscle Energy Technique (MET)on both pain intensity and functional disability in patients with NSNP. Methods: Forty-two(30 males and 12 females) patients with NSNP divided randomly into three groups: Group A: received Graston Technique and traditional physiotherapy treatment (TPT), Group B: received muscle energy technique and TPT, and Group C: received TPT only. Intervention lasted for 12 sessions (3per week). At the start and finish of the fourth week, a visual analogue scale was used to quantify pain intensity and a neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire was used to measure functional disability. Results: There were significant mean effects of time (pre/post) and intervention group (Graston, MET, conventional) and significant interaction on pain and disability (p<0.05). MET group had higher changes in the pain than both Graston and control groups (p<0.05). However, no significant differences among groups in the functional change. Conclusion: GT and MET had similar effects on the function in patients with NSNP, but MET had highereffects on reducing pain.
publication.page.subject
Non specific neck pain , Neck disability , Graston Technique , Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization , Muscle energy technique , Dolor de cuello inespecífico , Discapacidad del cuello , Técnica de Graston , Movilización de tejidos blandos asistida por instrumentos , Técnica de energía muscular
Citation
Sport TK: revista euroamericana de ciencias del deporte, Vol. 12 (2023)
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/