Publication:
Water and saliva contamination effect on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a moisture-tolerant light cure system

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorVicente Hernández, Ascensión
dc.contributor.authorMena, Ana
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Ruiz, Antonio José
dc.contributor.authorBravo González, Luis Alberto
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-26T09:01:30Z
dc.date.available2024-06-26T09:01:30Z
dc.date.issued2009-01
dc.description© 2009 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in The Angle Orthodontist. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.2319/012208-37.1
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the effects of water and saliva contamination on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a moisture-tolerant light cure system. Materials and Methods: Brackets were bonded to 240 bovine lower incisors divided into 12 groups. Four bonding procedures were evaluated, including (1) TSEP/Transbond XT, (2) TMIP/ Transbond XT, (3) TSEP/Transbond PLUS, and (4) TMIP/Transbond PLUS, each under three different bonding conditions: without contamination, with water contamination, and with saliva contamination. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine. The adhesive remnant on the teeth was quantified with the use of image analyzing equipment. Results: Without contamination, bond strengths for the four procedures were similar (P > .05). TSEP/Tranbond PLUS and TMIP/Transbond PLUS left significantly less adhesive on the teeth after debonding than TSEP/Transbond XT and TMIP/Transbond XT (P < .008). Bond strength and adhesive remaining for TMIP/Transbond XT contaminated with water or saliva showed significantly worse performance than the other procedures evaluated (P < .008). Contamination (with water or saliva) did not affect either bond strength or adhesive remaining on the teeth for TSEP/ Transbond XT, TSEP/Transbond PLUS, or TMIP/Transbond PLUS (P > .017), although for TMIP/ Transbond XT, both variables showed significant reductions after contamination (P < .017). Conclusion: TSEP/Transbond PLUS, TMIP/Transbond PLUS, and TSEP/Transbond XT showed greater tolerance to wet conditions than was shown by TMIP/Transbond XT.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent6es
dc.identifier.citationAngle Orthodontist (2009) 79 (1): 127–132.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2319/012208-37.1
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0003-3219
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1945-7103
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/142685
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherEH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.es
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectMoisturees
dc.subjectBracketses
dc.subjectShear bond strengthes
dc.titleWater and saliva contamination effect on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a moisture-tolerant light cure systemes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
012208-37_1.pdf
Size:
81.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos