Publication: La recepción diferida de la narrativa de Roberto Arlt y Leopoldo Marechal.
Authors
Davis González, Ana
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/monteagudo.448561
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Este trabajo sugiere la expresión de recepción diferida para aludir a la atención de una obra en una época posterior a su publicación. Analizar la evolución de su recepció manifiesta los paradigmas estéticos, ideológicos y socio-políticos que rigen un periodo histórico. Para ejemplificar dicho análisis, nos serviremos de la narrativa de Roberto Arlt y Leopoldo Marechal, pues consideramos claves los juicios que padecieron algunos de sus textos. Nos proponemos demostrar que su recepción fue simétricamente opuesta y no totalmente motivada por cuestiones estéticas. Un examen conjunto permite profundizar en los criterios de época que condicionaron su admisión en el canon nacional.
The present work proposes the delayed reception for the acceptance of a specific book in a period after its publication. The route of its reception reveals the aesthetic, ideological and socio-political paradigms that govern a specific era. The study that follows exemplifies this methodological approach with the works of two writers: Roberto Arlt and Leopoldo Marechal. We consider key the judgments that both suffered when publishing certain texts because the changes of opinion among the critics have been symmetrically opposed and not totally motivated by aesthetic causes. A joint analysis of the two allows deepening the criteria of the period that conditioned their admission into the national canon.
The present work proposes the delayed reception for the acceptance of a specific book in a period after its publication. The route of its reception reveals the aesthetic, ideological and socio-political paradigms that govern a specific era. The study that follows exemplifies this methodological approach with the works of two writers: Roberto Arlt and Leopoldo Marechal. We consider key the judgments that both suffered when publishing certain texts because the changes of opinion among the critics have been symmetrically opposed and not totally motivated by aesthetic causes. A joint analysis of the two allows deepening the criteria of the period that conditioned their admission into the national canon.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Monteagudo, 3ª época, Nº 25, 2020
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/