Publication: El riesgo por lactancia. Delimitación: STS 13 mayo 2015 (comentario jurisprudencial)
Loading...
Date
2016-12-28
Authors
Sánchez Trigueros, Carmen
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La sentencia del Tribunal Supremo examinada expone que el riesgo por lactancia debe acreditarse y ser específico. En caso contrario ni se suspende el contrato, ni se devenga el subsidio de Seguridad Social. No basta que una Educadora en Centro de Integración esté expuesta a los riesgos genéricos (agresiones, contagios) del empleo. Su interés lo acredita que cuente con un Voto Particular y que aborde un supuesto relativamente frecuente.
The examined judgment/sentence of the Supreme/High Court states that the risk for breastfeeding must be established and be specific. Otherwise the contract is not suspended and the Social Security subsidy/allowance is not accrued. Not sufficient that an Educator from the Integration Centre is exposed to generic risks (aggression, contagions) of employment. Its interest accredits to have a private vote and to be addressed to a relatively common course.
The examined judgment/sentence of the Supreme/High Court states that the risk for breastfeeding must be established and be specific. Otherwise the contract is not suspended and the Social Security subsidy/allowance is not accrued. Not sufficient that an Educator from the Integration Centre is exposed to generic risks (aggression, contagions) of employment. Its interest accredits to have a private vote and to be addressed to a relatively common course.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.