Publication:
Comparison of different techniques for detection of Gal-GalNAc, an early marker of colonic neoplasia

Thumbnail Image
Files
Comparison of different techniques for detection of GalGalNAc an early marker of colonic neoplasia.pdf(2.01 MB)
Date
1999
relationships.isAuthorOfPublication
relationships.isSecondaryAuthorOf
relationships.isDirectorOf
Authors
Said, I.T. ; Shamsuddin, A.M. ; Sherief, M.A. ; Taleb, S.G. ; Aref, W.F. ; Kumar, D.
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia : F. Hernández
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
The tumor marker, D-galactose-B[1-31-Nacetyl- D-galactosamine (Gal-GalNAc, also known as Tantigen) can be identified by a very simple galactose oxidase-Schiff 's (GOS) reaction either on tissues or on rectal mucus samples from patients with colorectal neoplasms. Gal-GalNAc is expressed in the neoplastic mucosa as well as the remote non-neoplastic mucosa. It is, however, not expressed in colonic mucosa of normal subjects. We studied the expression of Gal-GalNAc by GOS reaction, lectin reactivity and immunocytochemistry in 10 normal, 45 precancerous [5 Crohn's disease, 15 ulcerative colitis (5 without dysplasia and 10 with dysplasia), 25 tubular adenomas], and 25 adenocarcinoma cases. Normal mucosa remote from tubular adenoma and adenocarcinoma was also studied. The GOS method was compared with reactivity of the lectin jacalin and immunostaining with antibody to T antigen (Anti-Tag Ab). GOS reaction was negative in all of the 10 normal specimens. Of the 5 Crohn's disease specimens, 2 were positive and 3 negative. In the 5 ulcerative colitis cases without dysplasia, positive reaction was seen in 2 cases and negative in 3. Of the 10 cases of ulcerative colitis with dysplasia, 5 showed positivity in dysplastic areas, and 3 of these were also positive in remote non dysplastic mucosa. Twenty of 25 tubular adenomas yielded a positive reaction in the adenoma, 14 of them showing positivity also in remote mucosa; 3 cases showed a positive reaction only in remote mucosa. Of the 25 adenocarcinomas, 21 showed a positive reaction in the adenocarcinoma as well as the remote mucosa. GOS reaction was intense in well differentiated adenocarcinoma and weak in poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Intense reaction was also seen in the intracellular mucus of some aberrant crypts and morphologically normal crypts remote from adenocarcinoma and tubular adenoma. GOS reaction showed an overall sensitivity of 75.7% and specificity of 100% for cancer and precancerous lesions. Jacalin reactivity was slightly more sensitive (84.3%) but less specific Offprint requests to: Dr. A.M. Shamsuddin, Department of Pathology ,l0 S Pine Street, Baltimore, MD, USA 21201-1192. Fax: 410-706-8414 (80%) and Tag Ab reactivity even less sensitive (50%) but as specific (100%) for neoplastic and dysplastic mucosa. We conclude that the detection of the carbohydrate moiety Gal-GalNAc varies with the technique used. Compared to other techniques, GOS reaction is extremely simple and has a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. It can be used for detection of this tumor marker in remote non-neoplastic mucosa of patients with neoplasia or at risk of developing neoplasia. It, therefore, could be used as a cost effective screening test in rectal biopsy specimens of such patients.
publication.page.subject
Tumor marker , Jacalin
Citation
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10201/19173
item.page.embargo
Collections
Histology and histopathology Vol.14, nº 2 (1999)
Ir a Estadísticas