Publication: La interpretación de la sostenibilidad y la sostenibilidad de la interpretación
Authors
Salas Lamamié de Clairac, Ramón
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
“Sostenibilidad” es un término controvertido por su implícita
disposición a sostener un sistema inviable. El análisis de sus
contradicciones nos emplaza a un horizonte de decrecimiento
que, lejos de innovaciones tecnológicas puntuales, nos exige
soluciones culturales globales. Esta urgencia, unida a la crisis del
modernismo y su legitimación de la autonomía y la inutilidad
artística, ha orientado al arte actual hacia prácticas contextuales
que, con frecuencia, abogan por una relación directa con “lo real”
no mediada por formalidades artísticas. El desprecio de esos
elementos de mediación y espacios de autonomía puede, sin
embargo, no solo dificultar la imprescindible reinterpretación y
reevaluación de los logros “reales” del sistema sino privilegiar el
funcionalismo y la degradación de los procesos de diferenciación
cultural en la que este medra.
ABSTRACT: “Sustainability” is a controversial term for its implied willingness to support an unworkable system. The analysis of its contradictions leads us to a horizon of “downshifting” that, far from specific technological innovations, demands global cultural solutions. This urgency, in addition to the crisis of modernism and its legitimation of artistic autonomy and futility, has encouraged contextual art practices. Practices that often advocate a direct relationship with the “real” without the mediation of artistic formalities. Neglecting these elements of mediation and those areas of autonomy may, however, not only hamper the necessary reinterpretation and reassessment of the “real” achievement of the system but also to give fuel to functionalism and distort the processes of cultural differentiation.
ABSTRACT: “Sustainability” is a controversial term for its implied willingness to support an unworkable system. The analysis of its contradictions leads us to a horizon of “downshifting” that, far from specific technological innovations, demands global cultural solutions. This urgency, in addition to the crisis of modernism and its legitimation of artistic autonomy and futility, has encouraged contextual art practices. Practices that often advocate a direct relationship with the “real” without the mediation of artistic formalities. Neglecting these elements of mediation and those areas of autonomy may, however, not only hamper the necessary reinterpretation and reassessment of the “real” achievement of the system but also to give fuel to functionalism and distort the processes of cultural differentiation.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.