Publication:
Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta- analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDopico, Jose
dc.contributor.authorKalemaj, Zamira
dc.contributor.authorButi, Jacopo
dc.contributor.authorRuben Garcia-Sanchez
dc.contributor.authorMardas, Nikos
dc.contributor.authorPardo Zamora, Guillermo
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.contributor.otherFacultades de la UMU
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-16T07:14:17Z
dc.date.available2026-04-16T07:14:17Z
dc.date.copyright© 2022 The Authors
dc.date.created2021-02-26
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractObjective: Two focused questions were addressed: Focused question (Q1) 1) Are there any differences between immediate and delayed placement in terms of (i) sur- vival rate, (ii) success rate, (iii) radiographic marginal bone levels, (iv) height/(v)thick- ness of buccal wall, (vi) peri-implant mucosal margin position, (vii) aesthetics outcomes and (viii) patient reported outcomes? Focused question 2 (Q2) What is the estimated effect size of immediate implant placement for all parameters included in Q1? Materials and methods: An electronic search (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and OpenGray) and hand search were conducted up to November 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) with delayed implant place- ment as controls were eligible in the analysis for Q1. Immediate dental implant arms RCTs, controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and prospective case series of immediate implant placement were eligible in the analysis for Q2. Results: Six papers (RCTs) were included in the analysis for Q1 and 53 papers (22 RCTs, 11 CCTs and 20 case series) for Q2. Q1: Meta-analyses did not show any signifi- cant difference in implant survival, but it did for bone levels and PES scores at 1 year post-loading, favouring the immediate group. Q2: Meta-analyses showed that imme- diate implants had a high survival rate (97%) and presented high PES scores (range 10.36 to 11.25). Information regarding marginal bone loss and gingival/papillary re- cession varied among all included studies. Conclusion: Similar survival rate was found between immediate and delayed implants. Immediate implants presented threefold early complications and twofold delayed complications. Success criteria should be reported more consistently, and the inci- dence/type of complications associated with immediate implants should be further explored.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent47
dc.identifier.citationGarcia-Sanchez, R., Dopico, J., Kalemaj, Z., Buti, J., Pardo Zamora, G., & Mardas, N. (2022). Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 33, 231–277.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13892
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/226081
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidad
dc.relation.ispartofClínica Odontológica Integrada de Adultos
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.13892
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectImaging
dc.subjectPatient-centred outcomes Radiology
dc.subjectSoft tissue–implant interactions
dc.subjectSurgical techniques
dc.subjectWound healing
dc.subjectBone implant interaction
dc.subject.odsObjetivo 3: Salud
dc.titleComparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement of dental implants: A systematic review and meta- analysis
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication39649446-591e-4ec8-9ed0-329de9b984b0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery39649446-591e-4ec8-9ed0-329de9b984b0
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2022 COIR Rev Syst - Garcia‐Sanchez - Comparison of clinical outcomes of immediate versus delayed placement.pdf
Size:
33.2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.37 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos