Publication: La ley aplicable a los accidentes internacionales de circulación (una cuestión no tan novedosa) 48 años desde el caso Babcock versus Jackson
Authors
Martínez Rivas, Francisco ; Manzanares Jiménez, Diego Pascual
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
El Derecho
publication.page.editor
Torre Olid, Francisco de la
Conde Colmenero, Pilar
Méndez Rocasolano, María
Conde Colmenero, Pilar
Méndez Rocasolano, María
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
Description
Abstract
Este trabajo examina las dos principales cuestiones a dilucidar en un supuesto de responsabilidad civil extracontractual de un accidente de circulación. Por un lado, la cuestión de la competencia judicial internacional, con especial protagonismo del Reglamento 44/200 l, en orden a determinar ante qué tribunales del Estado miembro debe ventilarse el procedimiento judicial. Por otro lado, la cuestión de la Ley aplicable al procedimiento judicial, en orden a fijar qué derecho será el aplicable para resolver la cuestión sometida a litis. En este sentido tiene especial protagonismo en nuestro país el desafortunado Convenio de La Haya de 4 de mayo de 1971 sobre Ley aplicable en materia de accidentes de circulación carretera, que dado lo trasnochado de su contenido se ha dado paso al Reglamento Roma I, que, paradójicamente no se encuentra en vigor en nuestro país, en materia de accidentes de circulación. Se trata de exponer un breve acercamiento a los cada vez más frecuentes accidentes de circulación en el ámbito internacional, todo ello motivado por las medidas de fomento de libre circulación de personas, empresas y factores productivos en la UE, y aportar soluciones a estos casos que, por su elemento internacional pudiera considerarse resbaladizos. -----------
This work examines both principal questions to explain extracontractual civil responsibility due to a traffic accident. On the one hand, international Court competence, with special protagonism of the Regulation 44/2001, in arder to determine whi'ch court of the states member should so/ve the issue. On the other hand, which Law is to apply to the Court proceedings, in arder to determine the Law that must rule the matter to be settled at Court. Especial/y relevant is in our country the unfortunate The Hague Convention of May 4, 1971 about Law applicable to international traffic accidents, given its obsolete content paradoxically The Rome I Regulation is being applied even though is not in force in our country. This is to provide a brief approach to the increasingly frequent traffic accidents in the international arena, ali motivated by the measures to pro mote free movement of persons, companies and factors of production in the BU, and provide solutions to these cases, since the international element could be considered slippery.
This work examines both principal questions to explain extracontractual civil responsibility due to a traffic accident. On the one hand, international Court competence, with special protagonism of the Regulation 44/2001, in arder to determine whi'ch court of the states member should so/ve the issue. On the other hand, which Law is to apply to the Court proceedings, in arder to determine the Law that must rule the matter to be settled at Court. Especial/y relevant is in our country the unfortunate The Hague Convention of May 4, 1971 about Law applicable to international traffic accidents, given its obsolete content paradoxically The Rome I Regulation is being applied even though is not in force in our country. This is to provide a brief approach to the increasingly frequent traffic accidents in the international arena, ali motivated by the measures to pro mote free movement of persons, companies and factors of production in the BU, and provide solutions to these cases, since the international element could be considered slippery.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.