Publication: Edad, género y resiliencia en la conducta sexual de riesgo para
ITS en adolescentes al Sur de México
Authors
Castillo Arcos, Lubia del Carmen ; Alvarez Aguirre, Alicia ; Bañuelos Barrera, Yolanda ; Valle Solís, Martha Ofelia ; Valdez Montero, Carolina ; Kantún Marín, María Amparo de Jesús
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Objetivo: Comparar las conductas sexuales de riesgo en estudiantes de preparatoria y diferenciar por
edad, género y nivel de resiliencia sexual.
Material y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, transversal y explicativo. La población de interés estuvo
conformada por 182 adolescentes de 15 y 16 años de dos instituciones educativas. La selección de la
muestra fue mediante un muestreo aleatorio estratificado.
Resultados: Los instrumentos de medición mostraron medidas de confiabilidad aceptables. El 69% de
los adolescentes refirió contar con 16 años de edad, mientras que el 64% correspondió al género
femenino. Los adolescentes de 16 años tuvieron promedios más altos en las conductas sexuales de
riesgo (M = 12.1, DE = 23.3) que los adolescentes de 15 años (M = 4.76, DE=14.6, U=2,984.0,
p=.038). En cuanto al género se presentaron diferencias significativas, las mujeres presentaron (M =
7.45, DE = 2.77) los hombres (M = 8.01, DE=2.03, U=3,714.0, p=.017). Mientras que el nivel de
resiliencia sexual también fue diferente, los adolescentes de 15 años mostraron niveles de resiliencia
más bajos (M=60.5, DE=13.6) que los adolescentes de 16 años (M=65.0, DE=17.3; U=2,809.0,
p=.034). El Modelo de Regresión Lineal identificó que las variables que mayor contribución tuvieron
2
fueron la edad, género y estado civil para la conducta sexual de riesgo (F=1.85, R ajustada=.065,
p=.052). En otro modelo la edad, genero y estado civil fueron significativas para el desarrollo de la resiliencia (F=5.4, R ajustada=.07, p=.001). La investigación sobre la conducta sexual del adolescente
y los factores que influyen en el comportamiento, es útil para comprender lo que motiva a los
adolescentes en participar o evitar las conductas de riesgo sexual.
ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the sexual risk behavior in high school students and differentiate by age, gender and level of sexual resilience. Methods: Descriptive, transversal and explanatory study. The target population consisted of 182 adolescents aged 15 to 16 years of two educational institutions. The selection of the sample was using a stratified random sampling. Results: Measuring instruments showed acceptable reliability measures. 69% of adolescents reported having 16 years of age, while 64% were female. Teenagers of 16 years had higher averages in sexual risk behaviors (M = 12.1, SD = 23.3) than adolescents of 15 years (M = 4.76, SD = 14.6, U = 2984.0, p = .038). Regarding gender, significant differences were found, women had (M = 7.45, SD = 2.77) for men (M = 8.01, SD = 2.03, U = 3714.0, p = .017). While the level of sexual resilience was also different, teens 15 years showed lower levels of resilience (M = 60.5, SD = 13.6) than adolescents of 16 years (M = 65.0, SD = 17.3; U = 2809.0, p = .034). The Linear Regression Model identified that the greatest contribution were variables were age, gender and marital status to sexual risk behavior (F = 1.85, 2 R ajustada = .065, p = .052). In another model age, gender and marital status were significant for the 2 development of resilience (F = 5.4, R ajustada = .07, p = .001). Research on adolescent sexual behavior and the factors that influence behavior, it is useful to understand what motivates adolescents to participate or avoid sexual risk behaviors.
ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the sexual risk behavior in high school students and differentiate by age, gender and level of sexual resilience. Methods: Descriptive, transversal and explanatory study. The target population consisted of 182 adolescents aged 15 to 16 years of two educational institutions. The selection of the sample was using a stratified random sampling. Results: Measuring instruments showed acceptable reliability measures. 69% of adolescents reported having 16 years of age, while 64% were female. Teenagers of 16 years had higher averages in sexual risk behaviors (M = 12.1, SD = 23.3) than adolescents of 15 years (M = 4.76, SD = 14.6, U = 2984.0, p = .038). Regarding gender, significant differences were found, women had (M = 7.45, SD = 2.77) for men (M = 8.01, SD = 2.03, U = 3714.0, p = .017). While the level of sexual resilience was also different, teens 15 years showed lower levels of resilience (M = 60.5, SD = 13.6) than adolescents of 16 years (M = 65.0, SD = 17.3; U = 2809.0, p = .034). The Linear Regression Model identified that the greatest contribution were variables were age, gender and marital status to sexual risk behavior (F = 1.85, 2 R ajustada = .065, p = .052). In another model age, gender and marital status were significant for the 2 development of resilience (F = 5.4, R ajustada = .07, p = .001). Research on adolescent sexual behavior and the factors that influence behavior, it is useful to understand what motivates adolescents to participate or avoid sexual risk behaviors.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Enfermería global, Vol. 16, nº 1 (2017)
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.