Publication: La problemática metodológica del fenómeno “inicial y regularmente” en la ontología-fundamental
Authors
Ivanoff Sabogal, Christian
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/daimon.528561
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
El artículo se ocupa con la problemática metodológica referida al concepto ambiguo del «inicial y regularmente» en la ontología-fundamental de Heidegger. Por un lado, indica que el Dasein existe «inicial y regularmente» en su desempeño preteorético; por otro lado, que el Dasein existe «inicial y regularmente» en la impropiedad. En esta investigación se expondrá la imposibilidad metodológica de mostrar y acreditar herme-néutico-fenomenológicamente que el Dasein por lo general se desempeña impropiamente, primero porque implicaría una colocación acrítica ingenua en el punto de partida mismo y, segundo, porque la fenomenología hermenéutica no se correlaciona a generalizaciones.
This paper deals with the methodologi-cal problem referring to the ambiguous concept of «proximally and for the most part» in Heidegger’s fundamental-ontology. On the one hand, it indicates that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in its pre-theoretical performance; on the other hand, that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in the inauthenticity. This research will expose the methodological impossibility of exhibiting and demonstrating hermeneutic-phenomenologically that the Dasein generally exists inauthentic. Firstly, because it would imply a naive uncritical placement at the starting point and, secondly, because hermeneutic phenomeno-logy does not correlate to generalizations.
This paper deals with the methodologi-cal problem referring to the ambiguous concept of «proximally and for the most part» in Heidegger’s fundamental-ontology. On the one hand, it indicates that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in its pre-theoretical performance; on the other hand, that the Dasein exists «proximally and for the most part» in the inauthenticity. This research will expose the methodological impossibility of exhibiting and demonstrating hermeneutic-phenomenologically that the Dasein generally exists inauthentic. Firstly, because it would imply a naive uncritical placement at the starting point and, secondly, because hermeneutic phenomeno-logy does not correlate to generalizations.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, nº. 94, 2025, pp. 129-144
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/