Publication:
Aesthetic outcomes of different materials for delayed, single-tooth restorations for immediately placed implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorPardo Zamora, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorMolina-González, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Marco, José Francisco
dc.contributor.authorOrtiz Ruiz, Antonio José
dc.contributor.authorMardas, Nikos
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Sánchez, Rubén
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.contributor.departmentClínica Odontológica Integrada Infantil
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-18T10:39:24Z
dc.date.available2024-06-18T10:39:24Z
dc.date.issued2024-07
dc.description© 2024 Elsevier Ltd.
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study is to compare the aesthetic outcomes of metal porcelain (C), lithium disilicate (T1) and porcelain-layered zirconium (T2) immediate implant-supported single crowns in the anterior maxilla. Materials and methods Forty-five immediate dental implants were provided for 45 patients that required the extraction of a single tooth in the anterior maxilla. A temporary prosthesis was provided at 8 weeks after placement followed by the final prosthesis at 24 weeks post-implantation. The patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups: 15 patients in the control group (C) received a metal-porcelain restoration, 15 patients (T1) received a lithium disilicate (LD) restoration and 15 patients (T2) received a porcelain-layered, zirconium (Z) restoration. Pink (PES) and White (WES) esthetic scores, radiographic bone levels, periodontal parameters and patient's esthetic satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated at the time of final restoration placement (t0) and at 12-months post-loading (t12). Results No implants were lost during the duration of this study. Statistically significant higher WES and VAS scores (p < 0.05) were recorded in T1 vs C and T1 vs T2 groups respectively. Similar radiographic bone levels and periodontal parameters were recorded in all groups. Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that T1 restorations provided better WES outcomes when compared to C restorations and better VAS scores when compared to T2 restorations at 12 months post-loading. Besides, different material interphases did not have an impact in PES, bone levels or periodontal parameters. Clinical relevance There is limited data comparing aesthetic outcomes of implant supported single crowns made of different ceramic materials based on accepted and comparable indexes and the evaluation of the patient's perspective regarding these aesthetic outcomes.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent9es
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, 2024, Vol. 146: 105067
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105067
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 0300-5712
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/142388
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherElsevieres
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571224002367
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.subjectAesthetic outcomeses
dc.subjectRandomised controlled triales
dc.subjectDental implantses
dc.subjectWhite (WES) esthetic scorees
dc.subjectPink (PES) esthetic scorees
dc.subjectLithium disilicatees
dc.subjectZirconiumes
dc.subjectSingle-tooth implantses
dc.titleAesthetic outcomes of different materials for delayed, single-tooth restorations for immediately placed implants. A randomized controlled clinical triales
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublication39649446-591e-4ec8-9ed0-329de9b984b0
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationc42f35e8-5f95-4c41-b084-a18ea989caea
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery39649446-591e-4ec8-9ed0-329de9b984b0
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1-s2.0-S0300571224002367-main.pdf
Size:
4.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos