Publication:
Learners’ perspectives on interprofessional simulation and co-debriefng: an exploratory mixed-methods study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorJosé Luis Díaz-Agea
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Agea, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorRos-Romero, Álvaro
dc.contributor.authorLeal Costa, César
dc.contributor.authorVera Pérez, José Antonio
dc.contributor.authorCánovas-Pallarés, Juan Manuel
dc.contributor.authorPiñero Zapata, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorCinesi-Gómez, César
dc.contributor.authorAdánez Martínez, María de Gracia
dc.contributor.authorPujalte-Jesús, María José
dc.contributor.authorCayuela Fuentes, Pedro Simón
dc.contributor.authorSegura López, Gabriel
dc.contributor.departmentEnfermería
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-10T09:51:45Z
dc.date.available2026-03-10T09:51:45Z
dc.date.copyright© 2026 José Luis Díaz-Agea et al.
dc.date.issued2026-02-26
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Interprofessional simulation enhances both technical and nontechnical skills among healthcare professionals, improving their clinical practice. Co-debriefng, where two facilitators lead debriefng sessions, is a common approach in these trainings. This study aims to assess educational aspects of interprofessional simulation and co-debriefng in postgraduate medical and emergency nursing students. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with a mixed-methods approach was conducted among postgraduate students (n = 46). A mixed-methods design was used, combining quantitative questionnaire data with qualitative content analysis of openended responses, allowing integration of numerical trends with in-depth learner perspectives. A valid and reliable ad hoc questionnaire was designed, and qualitative content analysis was used to examine participants’ free-text responses. Results: Students’ perceptions were evaluated across six dimensions: applicability, satisfaction, motivation, safe environment, organization, and co-debriefng. Signifcant diferences were found between medical and nursing students in all dimensions except applicability and organization. Overall, students rated interdisciplinary sessions and co-debriefng positively, though nurses highlighted areas for improvement, such as icebreaker activities, more dynamic simulations, and equal representation of both professions. Conclusions: While interprofessional simulation and co-debriefng were well received, participants—especially nurses—identifed areas for enhancement to ensure a more balanced and engaging learning experience. By integrating quantitative outcomes with qualitative insights, the study highlights when co-debriefng adds value in interprofessional simulation and when singlefacilitator approaches may be sufcient.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent12
dc.identifier.citationDíaz-Agea JL, Ros-Romero Á, Leal-Costa C, Segura-López G, Cayuela-Fuentes PS, Vera-Pérez JA, Cánovas-Pallarés JM, Piñero-Zapata M, Cinesi-Gómez C, Adánez-Martínez MG, Pujalte-Jesús MJ. Learners' Perspectives on Interprofessional Simulation and Co-Debriefing: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study. J Nurs Manag. 2026 Feb 26;2026:3787497. doi: 10.1155/jonm/3787497. PMID: 41767794; PMCID: PMC12937087.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/jonm/3787497
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2834
dc.identifier.issn0966-0429
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/219421
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidad
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/jonm/3787497
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectCo-debriefing
dc.subjectEmergency
dc.subjectExperiental learning
dc.subjectHealthcare temwork
dc.subjectInterprofessional simulation
dc.subjectMedical and nursing education
dc.subjectSimulation training
dc.subject.odsObjetivo 3: Salud
dc.titleLearners’ perspectives on interprofessional simulation and co-debriefng: an exploratory mixed-methods study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd807982a-83e0-478c-822c-4d6f604047c0
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione6704fc1-0d8a-4b46-8fe5-3279aa14cb52
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationd9bea34a-a559-453b-95c9-ab6b3d643692
relation.isAuthorOfPublication52975312-d175-471e-a26b-e19c2e6af65a
relation.isAuthorOfPublication3ebd20e8-2a9b-4e44-b254-5fce269b2001
relation.isAuthorOfPublication44c9eb7e-b3a8-46c5-ba06-16401d4c4fe8
relation.isAuthorOfPublication99a6942e-5e92-45a7-8180-258f7228f62f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryd807982a-83e0-478c-822c-4d6f604047c0
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JONM-2026-3787497.pdf
Size:
993.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.37 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Artículos