Publication: Mesa 6. Tradición en crisis.-Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch y Jacques Derrida para una lectura alternativa de la crisis
Authors
Rosàs Tosas, Mar
item.page.secondaryauthor
Universidad de Murcia
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
Description
Abstract
Resumen: Acostumbramos a definir la crisis negativamente como una situación de «falta»
respecto de una situación ideal. La idea que subyace bajo esta concepción de la crisis es que hay un
estadio que encarna la plenitud y completitud: la síntesis del proceso dialéctico, en términos de Hegel; el
fin de la historia, en términos de Kojève y Fukuyama. A esta forma de entender la noción de crisis
queremos oponer otra, con la ayuda de Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch y Jacques Derrida, que ponga
énfasis en la fractura de la totalidad y en la apertura al porvenir como aspectos positivos de la crisis, así
como en la imposibilidad de llegar a un estadio definitivo.
Abstract: We tend to define the word «crisis» negatively, as a situation of «lack» in relation to an ideal situation. The idea which underlines this account of the term «crisis» is that there is a stage which embodies fullness: the synthesis of the dialectical process, in Hegelian termes; the end of History, in the terms used by Kojève and Fukuyama. With the help of Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch and Jacques Derrida, we want to put forward a way of understanding the term «crisis» which, in contradistinction to the aforementioned one, lays emphasis on the the fracture of the totality and the opennes to the future as positive aspects of the crisis, as awell as on the impossibility to reach a definitive stage.
Abstract: We tend to define the word «crisis» negatively, as a situation of «lack» in relation to an ideal situation. The idea which underlines this account of the term «crisis» is that there is a stage which embodies fullness: the synthesis of the dialectical process, in Hegelian termes; the end of History, in the terms used by Kojève and Fukuyama. With the help of Theodor Adorno, Ernst Bloch and Jacques Derrida, we want to put forward a way of understanding the term «crisis» which, in contradistinction to the aforementioned one, lays emphasis on the the fracture of the totality and the opennes to the future as positive aspects of the crisis, as awell as on the impossibility to reach a definitive stage.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/