Publication: Ponencias.-Crisis de género en filosofía, y enormousresponsibility
Authors
Patricio Peñalver Gómez
item.page.secondaryauthor
Facultades, Departamentos, Servicios y Escuelas::Departamentos de la UMU::Filosofía
item.page.director
Publisher
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
Description
Abstract
RESUMEN
Este ensayo sitúa el motivo de la responsabilidad como tema central de la ética, con especial referencia a la
filosofía moral madura de Agnes Heller. Se muestra la relevancia del concepto de “responsabilidad enorme”,
ligado al de “responsabilidad histórico-mundial” por el Bien o por el Mal en el mundo, en el marco de una
tipología de las responsabilidades (retrospectiva-prospectiva, general-singular). Nos interesamos en la conexión
entre una filosofía de la responsabilidad enorme (que incluye la responsabilidad por el otro en el sentido de la
heterología de Derrida y Lévinas), y el cambio que afecta a la forma de la filosofía, a la filosofía como género.
ABSTRACT This essay situates the motif of the responsibility as central subject of the ethics, with special emphase in the moral philosophy mature of Agnes Heller. The paper shows the relevance of the specific concept of “enormous responsibility”, connected to the concept of the “world-historical responsibility” for Good and for Evil, in the framework of a typology of responsibilities (retrospective-prospective, general-individual). The essay focuses also the question of the relationship between an ethics of the responsibility enormous (wich includes the responsibility for the Other in the heterology of Derrida and Lévinas), and the change of the form of philosophy, of philosophy as genre.
ABSTRACT This essay situates the motif of the responsibility as central subject of the ethics, with special emphase in the moral philosophy mature of Agnes Heller. The paper shows the relevance of the specific concept of “enormous responsibility”, connected to the concept of the “world-historical responsibility” for Good and for Evil, in the framework of a typology of responsibilities (retrospective-prospective, general-individual). The essay focuses also the question of the relationship between an ethics of the responsibility enormous (wich includes the responsibility for the Other in the heterology of Derrida and Lévinas), and the change of the form of philosophy, of philosophy as genre.
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/