Publication: Reflexiones sobre el potencial de protección internacional de los derechos humanos en la era de la neurotecnología.
Authors
Elizalde Carranza, Miguel Ángel
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones.
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.652501
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Los avances de la neurotecnología para inferir estados mentales a partir de los datos cerebrales y para incidir en el comportamiento humano a través de la modulación de los procesos neuronales generan problemas éticos y jurídicos que preocupan a la comunidad internacional. Algunos sectores consideran que la protección existente es insuficiente y proponen la adopción de nuevos derechos humanos para proteger la mente, que denominan “neuroderechos”. Sin embargo, tras un análisis de algunos de los derechos humanos existentes con mayor potencial para hacer frente a los riesgos de la neurotecnología, se concluye que no es evidente que a nivel universal o regional la protección sea insuficiente.
Abstract: Advances in neurotechnology that enable the inference of mental states from brain data and the influence on human behavior through the modulation of neural processes raise ethical and legal concerns within the international community. Some sectors argue that existing protections are insufficient and advocate for the adoption of new human rights, referred to as "neurorights," to safeguard the mind. However, after analyzing some of the existing international human rights with the greatest potential to address the risks posed by neurotechnology, it is not evident that protection at the universal or regional level is insufficient.
Abstract: Advances in neurotechnology that enable the inference of mental states from brain data and the influence on human behavior through the modulation of neural processes raise ethical and legal concerns within the international community. Some sectors argue that existing protections are insufficient and advocate for the adoption of new human rights, referred to as "neurorights," to safeguard the mind. However, after analyzing some of the existing international human rights with the greatest potential to address the risks posed by neurotechnology, it is not evident that protection at the universal or regional level is insufficient.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Elizalde Carranza, M. Ángel. (2025). Reflexiones sobre el potencial de protección internacional de los derechos humanos en la era de la neurotecnología. Anales De Derecho, 42(1), 131–179. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesderecho.652501
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/