Publication: La Revolución rusa en la prensa murciana: de la desinformación a la manipulación
Authors
Egea Bruno, Pedro María
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
La finalidad de este artículo es analizar la prensa como creadora de opinión
pública, centrándonos en la percepción de la Revolución rusa en la sociedad
murciana en dos periódicos del sistema de la Restauración: conservador y
reformista. Una lectura política de las consecuencias de aquel hecho
trascendental en la historia de la humanidad, donde prima la carga ideológica y
de la que se derivaron dos propuestas: contrarrevolución y reforma. Frente al
reformismo liberal se abría paso la vía autoritaria de los conservadores. Pocas
voces se alzaron pidiendo el fin de un régimen caduco, lastrado por la oligarquía
y el caciquismo.
Abstract: This paper aims at evaluating the role of the press as an opinion maker, focusing on public perceptions of the Russian Revolution in Murcia, by analysing the coverage given by two newspapers, one conservative and the other reformist, of the Spanish Restoration System. Political interpretations of such a transcendental fact in the history of humankind, loaded with ideological contents, prevailed and paved the way for two strands of proposals: counter-revolution and reform. However, liberal reformism was outstripped by authoritarian conservatives. Only few voices called for the end of an exhausted regime sustained by the oligarchy and caciquismo.
Abstract: This paper aims at evaluating the role of the press as an opinion maker, focusing on public perceptions of the Russian Revolution in Murcia, by analysing the coverage given by two newspapers, one conservative and the other reformist, of the Spanish Restoration System. Political interpretations of such a transcendental fact in the history of humankind, loaded with ideological contents, prevailed and paved the way for two strands of proposals: counter-revolution and reform. However, liberal reformism was outstripped by authoritarian conservatives. Only few voices called for the end of an exhausted regime sustained by the oligarchy and caciquismo.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Sociología histórica, nº 8 (2017)
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.